Hi,

  According to the article in the link which compares CPU for DXT compression and says that PS4 can generatea at 14MB/s compared to Xbox one 12MB/s. So, this makes sense that PS4 CPU clock speed is actually not 1.6Ghz and its better than Xbox one.

http://gamingbolt.com/substance-engine-increases-ps4-xbox-one-texture-generation-speed-to-14-mbs-12-mbs-respectively

I guess the PS4's CPU is clocked at around 2 Ghz compared to the X1's 1.75 Ghz.

I have no idea what these people are actually doing to get to their graph (other than saying "Buy our product"), absolutely nothing can be said about the cpus.

That's one benchmark, and it's not even relevant to a normal mix of game workloads.

You'll need far more evidence than that.

Games are mostly GPU limited so there's almost no point in placing high importance on awful jaguar cores. 

I mean, if you want to decide which CPU is better.

Not saying that's a useful question.

The core configurations from the PS4 and X1 are identical for the most. It`s just that PS4 is likely clocked around 16% higher I presume. That makes the PS4`s CPU part clocked at around 2 Ghz while the X1 was reported to be about 1.75 from major nelson. 

In summary the CPU part in both consoles are identical, it`s just that one is clocked higher than the other so I assume that the PS4s CPU is better.

Note: I will interpret that this test was done using all 8 cores. 

The cores are identical. How they are wired to each other and to memory may not be, which is just as important.

Generating textures isn`t memory bandwidth intensive. The task at hand is floating point intensive which is almost entirely dependent on the CPUs FPU. 

According to the article the graph is only for 1 CPU.