By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Cinemablend: Wii U Is Winning Next-Gen Gaming, Not Xbox One Or PS4

Aielyn said:

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Wii-U-Winning-Next-Gen-Gaming-Xbox-One-Or-PS4-61059.html

"PS4 and Xbox One's small software libraries don't stack up well against the Wii U's offering, either. The Wii U launched with higher rated titles than the PlayStation 4 and the Xbox One. The Xbox One and PS4 fare even worse in the software match-up when you factor in recent Wii U releases like Super Mario 3D World and Edge."

"It's not a two-way race, though. It's a three-way competition and right now the PS4 and Xbox One are both losing to the Wii U."

 

I quite liked reading this article. Thought people might find it interesting. No doubt the trolls and console warmongers will be in here soon, though. Note that neither I nor the article suggest that Wii U will necessarily win in the long run.

Indeed it is winning, for now, and has more titles available, for now.
All you would expect from a console that's already been on the market for a year.......

Am I missing something here? Completely failing to get the point of this article other than to state the obvious to clickbait nintendo fans.



Around the Network
fatslob-:irhO said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
Metacritic scores means nothing if your games keep flopping on a commercial basis.

Would you rather a system full of crappy games that sell well to the masses?

Those so called "crappy" games are realized in high quality according to the masses so yes.  

Great, you can enjoy Just Dance 4 and Angry Birds Star Wars, I'd rather play decent games regardless of their sales.

Your forgetting games like GTA V and COD there buddy. While you keep playing "quantity" games, I'll be playing "quality" games. 

Hmmm, I'm pretty sure that's my argument that you suddenly switched to...

Yet GTA V and COD sells alot so what's your point ? I guess you consider them as trash because their "crappy games that sell to the masses". 

I never said that. A good game can sell well or sell poorly for many reasons. I'd play it regardless of how it sells. Either way.

I won't avoid a game just because it appeals to the masses, but at the same time I won't buy a game because of it.

If it's sooo good then why does the rest of the market think differently ? To buy a game must mean that it's probably a good game because you don't spend your money on trash games. Therefore it speaks volumes about a games quality by the masses. SALES = QUALITY

Nope. SALES = POPULARITY.

Popularity can derive from quality, but also for less savoury reasons.

So why would people be buying themselves a bad game then ? 

You're having a hard time letting go and accepting the fact that people aren't infallible. They buy and buy into crap all of the time. 



I loled so hard at that picture on that site



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

gigantor21 said:
Almost all of the argument hinges on the year-long head start, not any tangible, inherent advantages the WiiU has. It would be no better saying that the PS4 and Xone are better consoles because they've sold much faster during their launch period.

You could very easily retitle the article "Why You Shouldn't Buy Consoles At Launch" without changing much. As a pro WiiU piece, though, it's the same console war nonsense the OP tries to pre-emptively accuse potential critics of.

this a million times, /thread.



ironmanDX said:
fatslob-:O said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
Metacritic scores means nothing if your games keep flopping on a commercial basis.

Would you rather a system full of crappy games that sell well to the masses?

Those so called "crappy" games are realized in high quality according to the masses so yes.  


CoD falls under that. You lost the War even before it began.

 

The masses are stupid.

Then I guess Halo, GT, and mario are trash then ? 

If the masses were truly stupid then why do they also dissociate from the bad games you hardcore gamers hate then ? Because much like you they think the game is likely trash like Too human or duke nukem forever.



Around the Network
mysteryman said:

You're having a hard time letting go and accepting the fact that people aren't infallible. They buy and buy into crap all of the time. 

People don't lie about what they desire obviously so how can you tell that they think it's crap ? 



Aielyn said:

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Wii-U-Winning-Next-Gen-Gaming-Xbox-One-Or-PS4-61059.html

"PS4 and Xbox One's small software libraries don't stack up well against the Wii U's offering, either. The Wii U launched with higher rated titles than the PlayStation 4 and the Xbox One. The Xbox One and PS4 fare even worse in the software match-up when you factor in recent Wii U releases like Super Mario 3D World and Edge."

"It's not a two-way race, though. It's a three-way competition and right now the PS4 and Xbox One are both losing to the Wii U."

 

I quite liked reading this article. Thought people might find it interesting. No doubt the trolls and console warmongers will be in here soon, though. Note that neither I nor the article suggest that Wii U will necessarily win in the long run.

Good, because it won't. Using metacritic, PS360 have well over 50 90+ rated titles, Wii has around 12.

Not using Meta because as time goes on I realise how silly it is) PS4 and XB1 will have far more third party games, it won't be a year before their libraries eclipse the WiiU's.



 

fatslob-:O said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
Metacritic scores means nothing if your games keep flopping on a commercial basis.

Would you rather a system full of crappy games that sell well to the masses?

Those so called "crappy" games are realized in high quality according to the masses so yes.  

This is probably is now number 1 for most idiotic post I've seen on vgchartz so far, keep em' coming fatslob, you take out most of the top 10.

Moderated - Kresnik.



bosslug said:
fatslob-:O said:
mysteryman said:
fatslob-:O said:
Metacritic scores means nothing if your games keep flopping on a commercial basis.

Would you rather a system full of crappy games that sell well to the masses?

Those so called "crappy" games are realized in high quality according to the masses so yes.  

This is probably is now number 1 for most idiotic post I've seen on vgchartz so far, keep em' coming fatslob, you take out most of the top 10.

Your probably sad that most of your games get denied. LOL Thanks for that worthless post.



Seece said:
Aielyn said:

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Wii-U-Winning-Next-Gen-Gaming-Xbox-One-Or-PS4-61059.html

"PS4 and Xbox One's small software libraries don't stack up well against the Wii U's offering, either. The Wii U launched with higher rated titles than the PlayStation 4 and the Xbox One. The Xbox One and PS4 fare even worse in the software match-up when you factor in recent Wii U releases like Super Mario 3D World and Edge."

"It's not a two-way race, though. It's a three-way competition and right now the PS4 and Xbox One are both losing to the Wii U."

 

I quite liked reading this article. Thought people might find it interesting. No doubt the trolls and console warmongers will be in here soon, though. Note that neither I nor the article suggest that Wii U will necessarily win in the long run.

Good, because it won't. Using metacritic, PS360 have well over 50 90+ rated titles, Wii has around 12.

Not using Meta because as time goes on I realise how silly it is) PS4 and XB1 will have far more third party games, it won't be a year before their libraries eclipse the WiiU's.


/end thread. There's only so many games Nintendo themselves can pump out.