Rayman Legends is simply beautiful!
And I´ve seen nothing on PS4/XBone that comes close to X.
The art-style is mind-blowing!
Which game do you think looks the nicest so far? | |||
Killzone: Shadow Fall (PS4) | 130 | 26.21% | |
Ryse (XBONE) | 60 | 12.10% | |
Killer Instinct (XBONE) | 1 | 0.20% | |
Contrast (PS4) | 1 | 0.20% | |
Nintendoland (Wii U) | 5 | 1.01% | |
Super Mario 3D World (Wii U) | 196 | 39.52% | |
Battlefield 4 (PS4/XBONE) | 18 | 3.63% | |
Call of Duty: Ghosts (PS4/XBONE) | 0 | 0% | |
Pikmin 3 (Wii U) | 62 | 12.50% | |
Other | 23 | 4.64% | |
Total: | 496 |
Rayman Legends is simply beautiful!
And I´ve seen nothing on PS4/XBone that comes close to X.
The art-style is mind-blowing!
Lyrikalstylez said: I guarantee 2-3 years from now you will truly see the graphical difference between wii u and next gen consoles! |
Will nextgen consoles ever make this look dated, this game still looks amazing techically, and artistcally.
Raphael said: Rayman Legends is simply beautiful! And I´ve seen nothing on PS4/XBone that comes close to X. The art-style is mind-blowing! |
this is a generation ahead of it graphically.
WWHD is the best looking game I've played, but several others that I haven't played look like they might be better including Mario and Killzone.
drake4 said:
this is a generation ahead of it graphically.
|
I have a boner right now.....
No... just no.... art style prefrence is one thing but truth is it can be replicated and improved with better hardware (see 3d dot game heros replicating 8bit era gaming). I feel as this thread is just trying to justify the inferior hardwarr of the wii by nintendo fans. But really... that shouldnt even matter. There is no getting around the fact KZ is a better graphical showcase than anything on Wii U.
From E3 i got a few games that really impressed me: Mario Kart 8, Mirror`s Edge 2 and another one (probably X). Today i have got to add Mario 3D World to that list. The game is just beautiful.
Max King of the Wild said: No... just no.... art style prefrence is one thing but truth is it can be replicated and improved with better hardware (see 3d dot game heros replicating 8bit era gaming). I feel as this thread is just trying to justify the inferior hardwarr of the wii by nintendo fans. But really... that shouldnt even matter. There is no getting around the fact KZ is a better graphical showcase than anything on Wii U. |
That's why he said "visually impressive" instead of "technically imressive". Learn to read man.
Nintendo and PC gamer
If "visually impressive" means "beautiful", than X and Rayman
are more visually impressive than Killzone, Forza or Battlefield.
If "visually impressive" means "hardware hungry", than Killzone
and Forza are visually impressive.
Max King of the Wild said: No... just no.... art style prefrence is one thing but truth is it can be replicated and improved with better hardware (see 3d dot game heros replicating 8bit era gaming). I feel as this thread is just trying to justify the inferior hardwarr of the wii by nintendo fans. But really... that shouldnt even matter. There is no getting around the fact KZ is a better graphical showcase than anything on Wii U. |
of course he's not disputing that, you would have to be insane. i think the reason people are so impressed with mario and sonic is cause cartoony colorful platformers are a dying breed, nobody else makes them except for nintendo and sega but the most beautiful by far is rayman.