By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smeags Hype Thread: Are You Hyped?

Tagged games:

 

Are You Excited?

Yes, very! 62 68.89%
 
Kind of. 10 11.11%
 
Neutral. 8 8.89%
 
Not at all! (What's wrong with you?) 10 11.11%
 
Total:90
Mr Khan on 18 December 2013

Just "why" on Kili x Tauriel

the rest was pretty good, stood a little closer to canon and fleshed out some good things like Laketown politics or Dol Guldur. Changing the Arkenstone to be an artifact that would allow Thorin to rule was a nice touch, as it actually made more sense than the canonical plot, which was "Find Smaug, Bring Burglar, ???, Profit!" Here they only wanted the Arkenstone, and with it could rally the Dwarves to fight off Smaug.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
DerpSandwich on 18 December 2013

Can't get over Smeags.



Currently playing:

Bloodbath Paddy Wagon Ultra 9

lilwingman on 18 December 2013
Mr Khan said:
Just "why" on Kili x Tauriel

Agreed.  This was the only UGH moment for me.  Otherwise I thought the movie was brilliantly done and a return to form for PJ.  High energy from start to finish. 



It's all about the game.

Aldro on 18 December 2013
Mr Khan said:
Just "why" on Kili x Tauriel

the rest was pretty good, stood a little closer to canon and fleshed out some good things like Laketown politics or Dol Guldur. Changing the Arkenstone to be an artifact that would allow Thorin to rule was a nice touch, as it actually made more sense than the canonical plot, which was "Find Smaug, Bring Burglar, ???, Profit!" Here they only wanted the Arkenstone, and with it could rally the Dwarves to fight off Smaug.

Because sausage parties are no fun.

 

Seriously though did you SEE Tauriel?



Mr Khan on 18 December 2013
Aldro said:
Mr Khan said:
Just "why" on Kili x Tauriel

the rest was pretty good, stood a little closer to canon and fleshed out some good things like Laketown politics or Dol Guldur. Changing the Arkenstone to be an artifact that would allow Thorin to rule was a nice touch, as it actually made more sense than the canonical plot, which was "Find Smaug, Bring Burglar, ???, Profit!" Here they only wanted the Arkenstone, and with it could rally the Dwarves to fight off Smaug.

Because sausage parties are no fun.

 

Seriously though did you SEE Tauriel?

No, i get why Tauriel needed to exist, but why the romantic tension with Kili? It runs entirely counter to every portrayal of Dwarves and how they interact with Elves.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
manuel on 18 December 2013



Need something off Play-Asia? http://www.play-asia.com/

lilwingman on 18 December 2013
Mr Khan said:
Aldro said:
Mr Khan said:
Just "why" on Kili x Tauriel

the rest was pretty good, stood a little closer to canon and fleshed out some good things like Laketown politics or Dol Guldur. Changing the Arkenstone to be an artifact that would allow Thorin to rule was a nice touch, as it actually made more sense than the canonical plot, which was "Find Smaug, Bring Burglar, ???, Profit!" Here they only wanted the Arkenstone, and with it could rally the Dwarves to fight off Smaug.

Because sausage parties are no fun.

 

Seriously though did you SEE Tauriel?

No, i get why Tauriel needed to exist, but why the romantic tension with Kili? It runs entirely counter to every portrayal of Dwarves and how they interact with Elves.


I always wondered why Kili was the only handsome dwarf.  Now it all makes sense... couldn't have her falling for Bombur, despite his surprisingly quick 40 yard dash time.



It's all about the game.

Aldro on 18 December 2013
Mr Khan said:
Aldro said:
Mr Khan said:
Just "why" on Kili x Tauriel

the rest was pretty good, stood a little closer to canon and fleshed out some good things like Laketown politics or Dol Guldur. Changing the Arkenstone to be an artifact that would allow Thorin to rule was a nice touch, as it actually made more sense than the canonical plot, which was "Find Smaug, Bring Burglar, ???, Profit!" Here they only wanted the Arkenstone, and with it could rally the Dwarves to fight off Smaug.

Because sausage parties are no fun.

 

Seriously though did you SEE Tauriel?

No, i get why Tauriel needed to exist, but why the romantic tension with Kili? It runs entirely counter to every portrayal of Dwarves and how they interact with Elves.

Because they saw an oppertunity to probably tell a bit about Legolasand it makes ..the next movie rather interesting. (If you've read the book), SPOILERS: Kili dies and with him having a romance, people will be able to atleast seperate him from any other dwarf (even if the book barely seems to mention him). Basically itll be more impactful. Maybe Tauriel dies alongside him as well. And I dont know about you but I'll weep if that hotness dies ;_;



Kaizar on 18 December 2013

Please copy & paste your reviews on this Thread:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=154457

 

And post what you think of 2014 3D movie trailers you saw here:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=173039

 

Thank you.



S.Peelman on 20 December 2013

Went to see it last night... 3D high frame-rate so it looked extremely sleek.

Needless to say, it... was... AWESOME.

It's better than the first Hobbit for sure, but sadly it also is the most open-ended of all the LotR/Hobbit movies! D*mnit why do I need to wait another year :-|.