By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Gran Turismo 6 Review Thread (Drama!!)

hi



Around the Network
sub-zero-TM said:
Cj2i3 said:
Psh. Silly Polygon don't they know they're supposed to give GT6 a 5/10 on account of them being funded by Microsoft.


LMAO! so right! They gave The Last of Us a 7.5 i mean really? 

I'll give it to them though atleast they haven't stooped to the level of a Quarter to Three.



kupomogli said:

Forza 5 vs GT6. Less content than Forza 4, new system, better score.

 

or you can forget the other parts that make a good sim.

Like forza 5 having better sound, physics/handling, more detailed cars. but forget that right having those 800 japanese cars and shitty sound design since the ps2 era is more important.



maple6142 said:
kupomogli said:

Forza 5 vs GT6. Less content than Forza 4, new system, better score.

 

or you can forget the other parts that make a good sim.

Like forza 5 having better sound, physics/handling, more detailed cars. but forget that right having those 800 japanese cars is more important.

Saying Forza 5 better physics or handling then GT6 is a stretch.

Saying it has an overall better layout, more intuitive design as far as menu's, upgrades etc... Etc... definately.

Visually better, sure.

GT has always had a diverse selection of cars and frankly still does.



I can understand it being a mixed bag, while Im loving GT6 right now it simply cant stand up against GT4. The game makes me feel like Im never being rewarded for my work. It dosent exactly feel like a game, but a driving simulator... which I guess they did warn me



Around the Network
Cj2i3 said:
maple6142 said:
kupomogli said:

Forza 5 vs GT6. Less content than Forza 4, new system, better score.

 

or you can forget the other parts that make a good sim.

Like forza 5 having better sound, physics/handling, more detailed cars. but forget that right having those 800 japanese cars is more important.

Saying Forza 5 better physics or handling then GT6 is a stretch.

Saying it has an overall better layout, more intuitive design as far as menu's, upgrades etc... Etc... definately.

Visually better, sure.

GT has always had a diverse selection of cars and frankly still does.

GT6's menus have actually been thoroughly streamlined this time around. 



maple6142 said:
kupomogli said:

Forza 5 vs GT6. Less content than Forza 4, new system, better score.

 

or you can forget the other parts that make a good sim.

Like forza 5 having better sound, physics/handling, more detailed cars. but forget that right having those 800 japanese cars is more important.

Very true anecdotal facts. Don't forget Forza 5's 1:1 tracks and night/day/weather cycles as well.



I'm kinda starting to like how harsh reviewers are becoming. Much better than the joke some places have been in the past.



those user reviews :> always nice to see for every fan of Gran Turismo there are 20 people who hate that those people like it and wanna give it a 0/10



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

I'm not a fan of FPS games really yet, some are mind numbingly dull and generic, I play some other generic FPS games and enjoy them, whether MP or campaign, so I'd say I could give a fair review of one. I mention this as same should be for those who review games, I'd never review a Sports sim as I don't play them and have no judgement on them.

The guy at Venturebeat cannot give a fair review. Most the others are fine but you don't open a review of GT6 saying you basically don't like driving sims.
And Videogamer.com - 6/10 "There’s an age old argument that simulation racing games are ‘just cars going around in circles’ – Gran Turismo 6 has no retort." I'm guessing this guy also doesn't watch motor racing. :P

Now Gamer is more of a fair review as he admits, while it plays the same as is as good as ever, the improvements don't feel all there.



Hmm, pie.