if they joined forces their profits would get too large, competitors would come and kill them all. Ironically Nintendo is the best Microsoft and Sony has, despite having better games. Its sad they dont see it and sabotage Nintendo everywere with guerrilla tactics.

If they had other big companies instead of Nintendo i dont think such lame companies as Microsoft and sony with their substandard uninnovative devices would prosper. I cant imagine google let them have such big profits for nothing.

I mean Nintendo is greater quality no question, but they dont use these nasty tricks. Against similar evil companies who bring quality as Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony both would have to say good by to the video game market.

The best hardware (Sony, a hardware company) with a great operating system (MS, a OS company) and networking with superb games (Nintendo, a games company).

Then Apple will arrive in the market, and we, the gamers of this glorious website, will have a true opponent.

I just cant see Microsoft and Nintendo getting along in any scenario.

Sony/Nintendo or Sony/Microsoft would be more realistic possibilities.

Monopolies very rarely fair well for consumers.

Maybe you can start complaining about these questions once you start trying with your replies?

Sony-Nintendo?
They make somewhat similar games, they're direct competition. Don't you think it's the opposite?

It would be like the Homer Car, just as a console

no Microsoft hates Nintendo, they want to destroy them.

No, in terms of strategy and policy they are pretty much opposites. And the games are nothing alike, i dont know where you are getting that idea from.

I was thinking that PS All Stars was somewhat very similar to Super Smash Bros.

Or maybe a kart game spin off of console mascot was something very known in Nintendo platforms.