Kudistos Megistos said:
pokoko said: However, if someone is arguing that they are too "manly" to play an androdynous character, then I would suggest instead that they have a lot of growing to do as a person before they can get over those kinds of minor and meaningless insecurities. |
Is that so? Maybe in some cases, but not in all.
Consider that a lot of people want to be able to relate to the main character, and even project themselves onto them. They want a main character who they can imagine themselves as. An MC who's an idealised version of themselves. It's aspirational.
Someone with a traditional "manly man" look and personality is obviously going to have more trouble relating to a very effeminate male lead. It doesn't have to be anything to do with insecurity or hating the MC; they just can't see anything of themselves or anything they aspire to in a character like that. For someone with more traditional values, a he-man MC is easier to relate to.
|
Honestly, it kind of annoys me that you clipped out the part where I said, "it just has to do with what people expect, what they prefer, and what they can associate with. Cultural differences aren't about right or wrong," and only included the paragraph where I'm talking about something different than simple preferences.
Also, most of the characters we're talking about aren't effeminate, they're simply closer to being beautiful than handsome. Most of them kick ass. If someone is so hung up on the looks of the character that they can't play a game, then yeah, that puzzles the hell out of me.
Of course, I admit that I have a real problem playing dumb characters, but that's because I experience a disconnect and loss of immersion when it comes to their decisions.