Me too.

Or did you mix that up? ;)

Nope the latter being the 1st one so W101...I actually played Knack at the Stanford Mall Sony Style...on 4K TV as well.  It's okay MosDef doing nothing special that would blow my 360 games away like Banjo, let alone Wii U games like 3D world!! (though I have not played 3D world but still ;P)

or like this

and this:

Don't forget the best looking Wii U game released so far:

Die shots don't matter when a console is taking less than 35 watts. Deal with it! 

This rumor is partly backed up by the fact that it takes less than 35 watts. Deal with it once again. 

BTW what fallacy is there when you yourself can't back up your point with sources ? (Uh oh it really sounds like your reaching for that damage control LOL.)

Wii U W101 vs Knack:

I actually prefer the latter!!!

Not even close!

Dudes like eyeofcore in this is an eye sore to high tech discussion. If we keep ignorant people like him out we can solve the puzzle more easily without disruptions from him. Others like Teriol keep going on to damage control. 

It's devoid of respect because they can't respect an opposing view of another but yeah you should buy the consoles based on games not hardware. 

To be fair, 35W =/= to 160 shaders. I'm not denying 160, and not saying it's more than that, but the GPU could definitely be very low powered and also have higher amount of shaders than Wii U. If you take everything into consideration, Latte runs at roughly 18-ish watts. I stated this before, the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a 400 shader graphics card, clocked at 650mhz, 40nm process, and it runs from 15-19 watts depending on load. This is a mobile part, but it was originally based on the PC versions, so a similar idea could have easily applied to Latte. 15-19 watts is the enire graphics card, the GPU itself will run about 3-5 less watts then that. So in the end, Wii U could have very well have been a 400 shader part and still retain the 33-36W it runs at. Though, it's obviously not a 400 shader part. 

In my view about die size, I think there is obviously more to the GPU than meets the eye. No, I'm not being a "delusional fanboy" making it more than it is (it's not compared to the 5 billion transistor X1 silicon), but sizes shouldn't be completely ignored, it's simply too much logic for a conventional 160 shader GPU. If we take measurements in terms of transistors, Latte at 40nm is 156.21mm² in size (the size of the GPU die), 40nm AMD GPUs are about 6.00 - 6.25 million transistors per mm² (I averaged several AMD 40nm GPU in terms of size and transistors that were available, and found other averages and came up with that average, a good Google search does wonders), meaning Latte has roughly 717-756 million transistors without the eDRAM, and for comparison, Xenos is 232 million transistors without eDRAM. eDRAM in Latte is around 220 million transistors if it is indeed 40nm Renesas eDRAM, so total, Latte is close to 1 billion transistors. This means Latte has about 3x more transistors compared to Xenos, likely having a lot to do with more modern architecture, and other fixed-function silicon Nintendo decided to include in it. BC stuff is likely very small part of the GPU, so I'm pretty positive that it doesn't take up much room at all, a few mm² at most. I don't know about what other people say, but a 160 shader part made up of 750 million transistors is not something to scoff at, most conventional 160 shader parts are much smaller than this. The HD 6450 has 160 shaders, 40nm but is 370 million trasnsistors. And to compare with a GPU with more shaders, 400 shader processor part HD 5670 at 40nm is 627 million transistors.