By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Ryse Son Of Rome. Best graphics of all next gen titles from a technical standpoint says IGN.

Sorry comparing Ryse or God of war to teh original Ninja Gaiden on th exbox is ajoke. Ninja gaiden the orignal one to thsi day still beats any hack and slash game as its based on pure skill and its challenging plus the comabt is moe in depth then both god of war and ryse combine. If you repeat teh moves inthe original gaiden ,, you will be killed.



Around the Network
Aldro said:

Because few games run at 1080 and look as good as those games do.

Obviously this isn't a "If 1080, insta win" kind of thing. But clearly you can agree on Shadow Fall giving Ryse a run for its money.

And ontop of that: Uncharted and TLOU while arguably the best looking games on the PS3, visually: are not exactly as technically impressive as say.. GTAV. Most awards seem to be based off of visual detail and fidelity hence why they are regarded as the best looking games on consoles.

But anyway back to TECHNICAL graphics =>

Now factor in 1080 for SF, with a variable framerate of 30-45 or whatever "unlocked" means (we have to wait and see) along with 60 fps on MP.

All I am saying is that the gap between Ryse and Shadow Fall is a "wait and see" as of now. It's hard to judge based off of videos only (check out the high bitrate release that GG did for SF and you'll see just how much youtube and other websites are ruining the real quality of these games).

And the resolution and framerate is in favour of Killzone.

Ontop of that: Killzone also offers larger levels with several ways to tackle things along with Higgers (helghast xD) which are known to have a great AI (furthermore: I've played it on the game convention and infact it was pretty damn clever) =>

When you add 1+1, you get 2.

 

Could Ryse still be visually better? Sure. Technically? It isn't likely but who knows. Maybe SF has some major issues. We have to wait and see.


The thing is you were speaking as if 1080p is "insta win."

I could argue Halo 4 is the best looking game of the gen because of its large enviornments, many character models running around, vehicles, etc. Yet people tell me Uncharted and Last of U are the best looking games of the gen.

Based on the Ryse game play trailers. We see a large number of character models and large detailed enviornments. It was stunning. I saw Killzone trailers, they honestly didn't really impress me much compared to BF4.

However, I'm gonna wait for the final products before I make a judgement.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Mr Puggsly said:
Aldro said:

Because few games run at 1080 and look as good as those games do.

Obviously this isn't a "If 1080, insta win" kind of thing. But clearly you can agree on Shadow Fall giving Ryse a run for its money.

And ontop of that: Uncharted and TLOU while arguably the best looking games on the PS3, visually: are not exactly as technically impressive as say.. GTAV. Most awards seem to be based off of visual detail and fidelity hence why they are regarded as the best looking games on consoles.

But anyway back to TECHNICAL graphics =>

Now factor in 1080 for SF, with a variable framerate of 30-45 or whatever "unlocked" means (we have to wait and see) along with 60 fps on MP.

All I am saying is that the gap between Ryse and Shadow Fall is a "wait and see" as of now. It's hard to judge based off of videos only (check out the high bitrate release that GG did for SF and you'll see just how much youtube and other websites are ruining the real quality of these games).

And the resolution and framerate is in favour of Killzone.

Ontop of that: Killzone also offers larger levels with several ways to tackle things along with Higgers (helghast xD) which are known to have a great AI (furthermore: I've played it on the game convention and infact it was pretty damn clever) =>

When you add 1+1, you get 2.

 

Could Ryse still be visually better? Sure. Technically? It isn't likely but who knows. Maybe SF has some major issues. We have to wait and see.


The thing is you were speaking as if 1080p is "insta win."

I could argue Halo 4 is the best looking game of the gen because of its large enviornments, many character models running around, vehicles, etc. Yet people tell me Uncharted and Last of U are the best looking games of the gen.

Based on the Ryse game play trailers. We see a large number of character models and large detailed enviornments. It was stunning. I saw Killzone trailers, they honestly didn't really impress me much compared to BF4.

However, I'm gonna wait for the final products before I make a judgement.

You are missunderstanding me my friend.

You could argue Halo 4 is the best looking game TECHNICALLY (although sandbox games are in general the most impressive ones technically).

I am trying to tell you that there's a difference between a game being visually stunning and technically stunning.

I am telling you that there is a vast chance that Killzone will be technically more impressive than Ryse. But I am not saying Killzone will be the better looking one visually.

Awards and what people generally go by is mostly visually.

Yes a game that is large is impressive, but if you judge them based on pure looks without taking any of that into consideration => Linear games most of the time will take the win. Hence why Uncharted and TLOU are known as being among this generations best looking console titles.

 

Now:
Selnor said that Ryse is technically better than Killzone whereas I stated: Due to Killzone looking the way it does compared to Ryse AND running on 1080 => it is unlikely (especially since you have to factor the KIND of games they are here as well). Technically: Killzone is probably doing more than Ryse just like Halo 4 did more than ..say Beyond Two Souls (to make a very clear example).

What will people find more visually appealing and give awards to most likely had Beyond and Halo been released at the same time? Beyond (seeming as Journey even got more than Halo 4 in 2012).

 

But who knows. Maybe Killzone looks like shit once its released and it was all smoke and mirrors. I am not debunking that Ryse might be visually, better looking. I too am waiting for a release.



We'll have to wait and see. I've been hearing the same of KZ:SF, and it's definitely not a slouch from what I've been seeing. Either way. Ryse does look impressive. Hopefully it delivers and turns out to be much more than eye candy. I can't wait to try it. I love period piece games, especially in the era of Ancient Rome.



 

Playstation = The Beast from the East

Sony + Nintendo = WIN! PS3 + PSV + PS4 + Wii U + 3DS


dane007 said:
Sorry comparing Ryse or God of war to teh original Ninja Gaiden on th exbox is ajoke. Ninja gaiden the orignal one to thsi day still beats any hack and slash game as its based on pure skill and its challenging plus the comabt is moe in depth then both god of war and ryse combine. If you repeat teh moves inthe original gaiden ,, you will be killed.

This, Ninja Gaiden on the original XBox is the deepest hack-n-slash I have ever played, and one of the best games of all time.



Around the Network
Aldro said:

You are missunderstanding me my friend.

You could argue Halo 4 is the best looking game TECHNICALLY (although sandbox games are in general the most impressive ones technically).

I am trying to tell you that there's a difference between a game being visually stunning and technically stunning.

I am telling you that there is a vast chance that Killzone will be technically more impressive than Ryse. But I am not saying Killzone will be the better looking one visually.

Awards and what people generally go by is mostly visually.

Yes a game that is large is impressive, but if you judge them based on pure looks without taking any of that into consideration => Linear games most of the time will take the win. Hence why Uncharted and TLOU are known as being among this generations best looking console titles.

 

Now:
Selnor said that Ryse is technically better than Killzone whereas I stated: Due to Killzone looking the way it does compared to Ryse AND running on 1080 => it is unlikely (especially since you have to factor the KIND of games they are here as well). Technically: Killzone is probably doing more than Ryse just like Halo 4 did more than ..say Beyond Two Souls (to make a very clear example).

What will people find more visually appealing and give awards to most likely had Beyond and Halo been released at the same time? Beyond (seeming as Journey even got more than Halo 4 in 2012).

 

But who knows. Maybe Killzone looks like shit once its released and it was all smoke and mirrors. I am not debunking that Ryse might be visually, better looking. I too am waiting for a release.


I feel the line is blurry between "technical" and "visual." You're feel they're completely different things, I don't necessarily agree.

Its just easier to say lets wait for the final product.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Yep! Ninja Gaiden Original Xbox version is the best action game there is and then Bayonneta. "My opinion of course"



CGI-Quality said:

Killzone's campaign is variable, meaning like God of War III, it runs 30-60fps the entire game (and never mind the 60fps multiplayer). There wasn't much of a sacrifice.

In the 7th generation, 1080p couldn't be a given, so 720p became the norm, which is how those games are considered top of their class.

But Killzone's campaign could have been 60 fps if they just dropped the campaign resolution, perhaps to 900p. So they're sacrificing frames for resolution.

You get the point in my 7th gen example. There is more to great graphics than resolution.

CoD Ghosts on 7th gen consoles and Metal Gear Rising potentially could have been 1080p at 30 fps. But would those games be considered the best looking 7th gen titles because of the resolution? Absolutely not.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Mr Puggsly said:
Aldro said:

You are missunderstanding me my friend.

You could argue Halo 4 is the best looking game TECHNICALLY (although sandbox games are in general the most impressive ones technically).

I am trying to tell you that there's a difference between a game being visually stunning and technically stunning.

I am telling you that there is a vast chance that Killzone will be technically more impressive than Ryse. But I am not saying Killzone will be the better looking one visually.

Awards and what people generally go by is mostly visually.

Yes a game that is large is impressive, but if you judge them based on pure looks without taking any of that into consideration => Linear games most of the time will take the win. Hence why Uncharted and TLOU are known as being among this generations best looking console titles.

 

Now:
Selnor said that Ryse is technically better than Killzone whereas I stated: Due to Killzone looking the way it does compared to Ryse AND running on 1080 => it is unlikely (especially since you have to factor the KIND of games they are here as well). Technically: Killzone is probably doing more than Ryse just like Halo 4 did more than ..say Beyond Two Souls (to make a very clear example).

What will people find more visually appealing and give awards to most likely had Beyond and Halo been released at the same time? Beyond (seeming as Journey even got more than Halo 4 in 2012).

 

But who knows. Maybe Killzone looks like shit once its released and it was all smoke and mirrors. I am not debunking that Ryse might be visually, better looking. I too am waiting for a release.


I feel the line is blurry between "technical" and "visual." You're feel they're completely different things, I don't necessarily agree.

Its just easier to say lets wait for the final product.

Fair enough :P (If I felt they were completely different, I wouldn't mention them together. KZ is giving Ryse a run on a pure visual note in my opinion and the technical side is most likely ahead of Ryse, hence why it's relevant. If Shadow Fall somehow is somehow more visually pleasing to all the reviewers and the technical aspect is ahead: Then that's pretty damn crazy. But yeah we really need to wait for the final product.)



CGI-Quality said:
selnor1983 said:

I disagree. The PS4 is now split up with no Camera EYE. Devs wont want to use it. Shame as Kinect 2.0 is blindingly accurate and responsive. The snap on feature the guy showed us all on The One is Id say 0.5 seconds? Def under 1 sec. And the seamless switching of apps. Xbox One is really impressive stuff. It felt fres, it didnt feel like just a more pwerful Xbox. It felt futurisitc, it felt new. 

Also the triggers on Forza 5. Holy C**p. Once you try this, without it would seem gimpy. Microsoft have REALLY delivered on these triggers. Its like watching Gladiator. Watcing it in stereo would be like no rumble triggers. Watcing it with 6.1 Surround is like playing with rumble triggers. Not a necessity, but SO SO much better.

This just tells me how far you're willing to go to ignore anything the competition could potentially bring to the table. As such, I'm done here.

Wut?

He said he likes new Kinect Features, the PS4 not going to get as much support for it's camera because it is not included, and likes the haptic triggers of the X1 controler. How in the world is this any dig on another console?

He didn't say anything negative about the DS4 or touch pad.  Just saying things he likes - I'm not following you.



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!