By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - My Battlefield 4 campaign review...

Tagged games:

Areym said:
Well , yeah. BF is all about multiplayer apparently. You would think people would have caught up by now.

This is such a stupid argument. If EA is gonna market the campagn, maybe they deliver a half decent campaign.

CoD is about the multiplayer as well. Yet year after year they make a solid campaign.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Around the Network

Its no excuse, CoD has an engrossing single player (mostly) and they're asking for the same price as CoD.



Intel core i7 930 OC @ 4.0 ghz

XFX Double dissipation Radeon HD 7950 356 bit 3gb GDDR5 OC @ 1150 MHz core + 1575 x 4 memory

Triple channel DDR 3 12gb RAM 1600 MHz

Remember when a great campaign was to be expected in a fps? (Perfect Dark, Goldeneye, Half Life 2) If it didn't, reviewers would give that game a not so good score.



curl-6 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I can't beleive they managed to make a campaign even worse than BF3. Pretty amazing stuff.

Surely you jest. The fucking Conduit games had better campaigns than BF3...

LOLOL. Both of their campaigns suck. To say that conduit had a better campaign is laughable at best. They were both just as bad. What matters the most is that BF4 is a higher quality game than what conduit could ever hope to be as evidenced by it's massive player base.



fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I can't beleive they managed to make a campaign even worse than BF3. Pretty amazing stuff.

Surely you jest. The fucking Conduit games had better campaigns than BF3...

LOLOL. Both of their campaigns suck. To say that conduit had a better campaign is laughable at best. They were both just as bad. What matters the most is that BF4 is a higher quality game than what conduit could ever hope to be as evidenced by it's massive player base.

I never said they didn't suck. I  was using their badness as an example that BF3 being even worse campaign-wise makes it truly awful.

Also, sales do not equal quality.



Around the Network
curl-6 said:
fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I can't beleive they managed to make a campaign even worse than BF3. Pretty amazing stuff.

Surely you jest. The fucking Conduit games had better campaigns than BF3...

LOLOL. Both of their campaigns suck. To say that conduit had a better campaign is laughable at best. They were both just as bad. What matters the most is that BF4 is a higher quality game than what conduit could ever hope to be as evidenced by it's massive player base.

I never said they didn't suck. I  was using their badness as an example that BF3 being even worse campaign-wise makes it truly awful.

Also, sales do not equal quality.

If sales did not equate to quality then I guess the Wii was an awful system while the virtual boy was the best thing since buttered toast LOL. I guess mario games are less than everything. (It's like malstrom said, people who do not use the business gavel so they will fail to get why something is successful in the first place.) Like it or not sales DOES equate to quality otherwise some publisher would stop funding it. That is why call of duty remains as the top franchise this generation compared to everything else. Call of duty is gold while conduit remains in brown stain.



fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I can't beleive they managed to make a campaign even worse than BF3. Pretty amazing stuff.

Surely you jest. The fucking Conduit games had better campaigns than BF3...

LOLOL. Both of their campaigns suck. To say that conduit had a better campaign is laughable at best. They were both just as bad. What matters the most is that BF4 is a higher quality game than what conduit could ever hope to be as evidenced by it's massive player base.

I never said they didn't suck. I  was using their badness as an example that BF3 being even worse campaign-wise makes it truly awful.

Also, sales do not equal quality.

If sales did not equate to quality then I guess the Wii was an awful system while the virtual boy was the best thing since buttered toast LOL. I guess mario games are less than everything. (It's like malstrom said, people who do not use the business gavel so they will fail to get why something is successful in the first place.) Like it or not sales DOES equate to quality otherwise some publisher would stop funding it. That is why call of duty remains as the top franchise this generation compared to everything else. Call of duty is gold while conduit remains in brown stain.

So then Angry Birds is the best video game ever made? ;)



Mr Puggsly said:
Areym said:
Well , yeah. BF is all about multiplayer apparently. You would think people would have caught up by now.

This is such a stupid argument. If EA is gonna market the campagn, maybe they deliver a half decent campaign.

CoD is about the multiplayer as well. Yet year after year they make a solid campaign.





curl-6 said:
fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I can't beleive they managed to make a campaign even worse than BF3. Pretty amazing stuff.

Surely you jest. The fucking Conduit games had better campaigns than BF3...

LOLOL. Both of their campaigns suck. To say that conduit had a better campaign is laughable at best. They were both just as bad. What matters the most is that BF4 is a higher quality game than what conduit could ever hope to be as evidenced by it's massive player base.

I never said they didn't suck. I  was using their badness as an example that BF3 being even worse campaign-wise makes it truly awful.

Also, sales do not equal quality.

If sales did not equate to quality then I guess the Wii was an awful system while the virtual boy was the best thing since buttered toast LOL. I guess mario games are less than everything. (It's like malstrom said, people who do not use the business gavel so they will fail to get why something is successful in the first place.) Like it or not sales DOES equate to quality otherwise some publisher would stop funding it. That is why call of duty remains as the top franchise this generation compared to everything else. Call of duty is gold while conduit remains in brown stain.

So then Angry Birds is the best video game ever made? ;)

For it's value absolutely.  

The conduit is sooo bad that I would resort to playing homefront, medal of honor, and even duke nukem forever LOL. The second game only sold like 100K. (I guess not too many gamers actually value it at all heheh.) 



fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I can't beleive they managed to make a campaign even worse than BF3. Pretty amazing stuff.

Surely you jest. The fucking Conduit games had better campaigns than BF3...

LOLOL. Both of their campaigns suck. To say that conduit had a better campaign is laughable at best. They were both just as bad. What matters the most is that BF4 is a higher quality game than what conduit could ever hope to be as evidenced by it's massive player base.

I never said they didn't suck. I  was using their badness as an example that BF3 being even worse campaign-wise makes it truly awful.

Also, sales do not equal quality.

If sales did not equate to quality then I guess the Wii was an awful system while the virtual boy was the best thing since buttered toast LOL. I guess mario games are less than everything. (It's like malstrom said, people who do not use the business gavel so they will fail to get why something is successful in the first place.) Like it or not sales DOES equate to quality otherwise some publisher would stop funding it. That is why call of duty remains as the top franchise this generation compared to everything else. Call of duty is gold while conduit remains in brown stain.

So then Angry Birds is the best video game ever made? ;)

For it's value absolutely.  

The conduit is sooo bad that I would resort to playing homefront, medal of honor, and even duke nukem forever LOL. The second game only sold like 100K. (I guess not too many gamers actually value it at all heheh.) 

And Wii Play is better game than The Last of Us? Ocarina of Time? Metroid Prime? Half Life 2? Bioshock?