S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
no 2010 was the last time Nintendo recorded a profit, Wii was still profitable at the time, it was other products that caused them to take a loss
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
no 2010 was the last time Nintendo recorded a profit, Wii was still profitable at the time, it was other products that caused them to take a loss
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
Sorry, but no matter how you twist it, Wii's lifespan did NOT end in 2010. It lasted six years; that is a normal console lifespan.
Also, Wii has always been profitable, since day 1. It was never sold at a loss.
zorg1000 said:
|
This. Thank you, Zorg.
He seems to struggle with this subject. I believe he once stated that 2010 was the year that the PS3 had finally wiped out all of the losses it had incurred for Sony when in reality it was the year that the hardware was no longer selling at a loss. Big difference.
zorg1000 said:
competition is of course a factor but there were also many other things at play |
Once again, no argument there. I'm not majorly in argument with you. I just believe the major issue was as demand was going down for the Wii the casual attention was drawn away from the Kinect. Many factors including lack of software might have played into that, but really....how many casuals pay attention everytime a new piece of Nintendo software comes out? Not many. It has to be highly commercialized. Last highly commercialized piece of tech in 2010 and 2011 was the Kinect. Thats my only point. ;)