nightsurge said: What are your thoughts on the accepted fact that science does not PROVE anything? Even my world renowned college biology and chemistry professors would start out their semesters with that tid-bit of information. |
I wouldn't entirely agree with that statement as a whole, but i understand the idea behind it and would agree with it in regards to evolution.
Evolution just happens to be supported by enough evidence that the argument for the alternative seems laughable. The alternate also doesn't explain the existence of dinosaur bones (other than some peoples belief that god put them there to trick us, which seems downright bizarre to me, but each to their own i suppose). In the same way i can't PROVE with 100% certainty that a hamster would lose in a cage fight against a lion, but i'm still going to put my money on the lion :P
I'm perfectly open to the idea that evolution was in some way guided by a god or being within the paramiters of one, but the idea that we were directly created by such a thing seems awfully egotistical of the human race. In the same way we used to believe we were at the center of the universe :P