fallen said: I see a lot of so called spec comparison on places like Neogaf that are incomplete, or extremely biased towards PS4 to the point of being nonsense, so I wanted make a true, unbiased reference. The PS4 will go second and be compared to the X1 baseline in terms of percentages. X1: Disc: 6X Blu Ray Disc capacity: 50 GB HDD: 500 GB 5400 RPM RAM quantity: 8GB CPU: 8 core (6 game usable) 1.75 ghz Jaguar (Plus SHAPE audio chip likely ~1 CPU core of audio processing, +cloud support which we will ignore for now but could offload things like AI from X1 CPU in the future) GPU FLOPS 1.31 teraflops Texture units 48 at 853 mhz Triangle setup engines: 2 at853 mhz ROPS 16 at 853 mhz Peak bandwidth: 204+68=272 GB/s Peak BW per GFLOP= 272,000 MB/S/1310=207.6 MB/S/GFLOP
PS4: Disc: 6X Blu Ray (+0%) Disc capacity: 50 GB (+0%) HDD 500GB 5400 RPM (+0%) RAM quantity: 8GB (+0%) CPU 8 core (6 game usable) Jaguar CPU 1.6 ghz (-9% raw, -24% after removing 1 core for audio processing to match SHAPE, ignoring X1's cloud capability for now) GPU FLOPS: 1.843 (+41%) Texture units: 72 at 800 mhz (+41%) ROPS: 32 at 800 mhz (+88%) (However, the real world impact will be much lower as 16 ROPS typically enough at 1080P and less) Peak bandwidth: 176 GB/s (-35%) Peak BW per GFLOP: 176,000 MB/S/1843=95.5 MB/S/GFLOP (-54%)
There you have the complete picture of baseline specs, subject to countless other variables we know nothing about...
From a high level, PS4 has a stronger GPU while X1 has a sigjnificant edge in peak bandwidth, and a slight to moderate advantage in CPU, which could grow if developers begin to leverage the cloud in the future. The disc read subystems and RAM quantities are identical. |
To all of ya'll talking about this; Shut the hell up. This is like the 25th post about xbox1 and ps4 specs. I can't come to this site without seeing xb1VSPS4. Xbox1 winner. PS4 winner.
Imma just get it all.