How

and

Why exactly would anyone expect a console with inferior GPU to have better graphics? Do you expect the Xbone to have better graphics than the PS4? I dont think so.

So you are calling it a lie that the 360 is simpler to code for?

I think you're trolling/joking now, but I really don't know :(

Pretty funny thread lol

I agree with those who have already stated that it's actually the exact opposite of what you're saying. It's the PS4 that gets the nod in this department, because it's the cheaper of the two. The casual guys won't even know which one is supposed to be more powerful in theory, and will likely assume that it's the X1 due to the higher price point, but they will see games looking very similar on PS4 and think to themselves "well this is a hundred bucks cheaper, so......"

The X1 has plenty of things going for it that will make it appeal to the more casual crowd. Power isn't one of those things.

And as for the next gen graphics "king".....pretty meaningless right now, because at launch they'll only be scratching the surface of what they can squeeze out of these system. And both systems have a visual powerhouse each in Ryse and Killzone, both of which I think look absolutely phenomenal. Ryse seems more technically impressive, but I give Killzone the nod because I dig the art style and I'm generally a bit of a sucker for sci-fi.

They didn´t win anything, but didn´t loose either. The average gamer will not see any difference at all between the consoles, and although PS4 costs less, the Kinect does represent a big draw for X1. It is to difficult to call, I only know the coming months will be interesting :).

I think we should wait awhile into the gen before we call anyone victors.

Naughty Dog, Santa Montica, 343, and more will show us what they got.

For example...

BF4 was confirmed running over 720p with 60fps fine in PS4.

Now in Xbone.

http://www.timurse.com/post/63004722183/bf4xbo

Translation...

• I played it on the business day of Igromir ("Game World" on English) in Moscow.
• The resolution was definitely 720p, running mostly 60fps.
• The game looks slightly better than Xbox 360 version of BF3 (I would say 50% better, no where near those videos of Paracel Storm gamescom build). Though textures are a lot better than on X360, some god rays, lots of foliage on the map.
• It was a new build with Domination on Zavod 311. No vehicles. Though everything is unlocked.
• For some strange reason player movement speed is VERY limited. It's like the sprint speed is somehow similar to the walking speed in BF3. I think it was this particular build fault. Cause on X360 the speed is ok.
• The controller is SO SHITTY I couldn't even aim properly (and got 55 eagle in X360 version and 20th level in PS3 version). EDIT: added my small gamepads comparision.
• The game ran on Xbox One debug kits. I saw one, it was black and I couldn't make any photo. There wasn't any local network mode, they used Windows server for the 26 machines.
• The game supports kinect for voice commands, leaning with your head behind the corners and some other stuff. You can choose the language of voice commands. 

Before somebody says it have a agenda...

• Knack (also watch my video of its horrible FPS drops)

From the same guy.

The difference between multiplats will be bigger than PS360.

Ok? so how did it win?

I reallyy hope this was satire... it was satire guys... wasnt it? Please... even if it wasnt just tell me it was

They won because they did not win

Hahahahaha, accusing people of being fanboys if they dare point out the differences, but then you write Killzone Shadowfail?

Its time for you to shut the fuck up and stop making stupid threads.