iamdeath said:
It takes time,. you clearly know nothing about technology. |
Hahahaha, that was a good one
iamdeath said:
It takes time,. you clearly know nothing about technology. |
Hahahaha, that was a good one
walsufnir said:
Hahahaha, that was a good one |
You still have not answered. if MS has so much for infrastructure and technology, why is their Cloud streaming further behind then sony's?
iamdeath said:
You still have not answered. if MS has so much for infrastructure and technology, why is their Cloud streaming further behind then sony's? |
You are confusing a lot of things here. Having servers, capabilities, storage, well established peering points, good deals for bandwidth is one thing, having applications running in the cloud is another thing. But yes, I know nothing about technology and need someone like you to tell me about it! It's gettint better and better
walsufnir said:
You are confusing a lot of things here. Having servers, capabilities, storage, well established peering points, good deals for bandwidth is one thing, having applications running in the cloud is another thing. But yes, I know nothing about technology and need someone like you to tell me about it! It's gettint better and better |
You just proved my point. There is A reason Sony ahs not launched gaikai yet, and the tech itself is not the reason...it takes time to haev apps, software and the service integrated into the ecosystem.
walsufnir said:
|
See how you are now contradicting yourself? If MS infrastructure is so ready why have they not even revealed their streaming tech? Works both ways huh?
iamdeath said:
Exactly.............MS is puilling to wool over peoples eyes again, Xbox is such a small part of MS business only a fraction of their cloud will evr be used for xbox. |
There is no wool. MS has the capacity to provide a cloud based compute service and dedicated servers for all developers on their platform. the fact that MS is expanding their business as a service is the reason all of their products benefit from this investment. The investement is still there no mattter how you spin it. The service and the infrastructure is there. Even the platform which MS spent 3 years build which is Orleans is there. I am not sure where you get the wool part. MS has the capability to provide the resources to support their claim and they spent more than 2 billion this year building more capacity.
I am not sure what conclusion you are coming to. Just because the X1 is not the primary revenue business for MS does not detract that it benefits from other areas of the business that make sense like Azure.
iamdeath said:
You still have not answered. if MS has so much for infrastructure and technology, why is their Cloud streaming further behind then sony's? |
You keep making this claim but you have no clue where MS is at. Hell, we do not really know where Sony is at. They say they are releasing next year but its very limited.
45ms is great. When I used OnLive and Gaikai back before Sony bought them I was constantly getting upwards of 150-200ms+.
J_Allard said: 45ms is great. When I used OnLive and Gaikai back before Sony bought them I was constantly getting upwards of 150-200ms+. |
Latency is dependant on so many variables... I am still not sure about this. Also interesting how many Sony fans have experienced Gaikai in the past... And that it was always a good experience... Not saying coincidence, no, definitely not saying this.