Do you agree? | |||
Yes | 10 | 76.92% | |
No | 3 | 23.08% | |
Total: | 13 |
Seems pretty legit. Like anything, giving the developers 25 different ways to do something versus 10 is always a good thing.
OT: I doubt COD will actually try to make a better shooter. Ever since modern warfare 2 the COD games have been getting worse.
I think it will have more to do with motion and performance capture. They have been using motion capture for years to get more natural looking movements. They have expanded performance capture, and I think it has more room to grow.
One of the last games used something like they used in Cameron's Avatar, front mounted face gear capture and cameras.. It would replace the work of many animators, and make a higher quality more natural game.
LA Noir had a version of this, but they did performance and audio separately. I think newer ones will just get better.
And if you really think about it. Avatar was made on tech around 5 years old! That's a few Moore's Law cycles.
Judging from the Dark Sorcerer demo, I believe him. I was honestly surprised at how good that was.
If you think about it, what developers were able to do on consoles was pretty amazing. I mean, if the the 360 and PS3 had been home PCs, people would have replaced them years ago, but we still got stuff like Halo 4 and TLoU, which rubbed right up against the limits of the hardware. That's pretty impressive.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.