superchunk said:
source? Apple has NOT used NFC yet. I believe I said IF Apple makes fingerprint work well it could be cool and it has to be biometric not just scanned, so I don't think they can steal your finger print without your finger. |
Apple's implementation of Bluetooth 4.0 basically does what NFC does, but with better range:
Everything I've read about the fingerprint scanner suggests that it wouldn't respond to a lifted surface print or even a rubber cast. It actually takes a capacitive scan of the meat under the loops and whorls of your epidermis. I've even seen claims that it would reject a severed finger.
On topic, 64-bit in the iPhone was simply Apple's way of more easily explaining to laypeople that was coming out with the first implementation of the ARMv8 instruction set, which is superior in all kinds of ways besides bitness. It's true that 64-bit itself probably doesn't do much for this version of iPhone.
But it pays to think ahead. The sooner Apple's whole ecosystem transitions to 64-bit, the sooner they can shed the bloat of maintaining 32-bit compatibility. Furthermore, we might only be a couple years away from iPads that want 4GB of RAM or more, as tablet sales continue to disrupt laptops. And finally, I wonder how well a 64-bit ARM chip with 8 GB of RAM and a flash drive might run Mac OS X...
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.