Mario Kart's system is its flaw.  It penalizes better players rather than the entire reason for multiplayer, win because you're the better player. (better players still win.  The system just allows players who aren't as good to still enjoy the game by having a fighting chance) I didn't add several games on either side because I didn't think of them.  Dragon's Crown is a  great game and I didn't list that anywhere on the Vita section.  I also didn't bother adding games that aren't very good or if I haven't played them heard they aren't very good.  The only racing games I can think of that I've missed on the 3DS is Driver Renegade, Ridge Racer, and Asphalt Injection, haven't played any of them, but Ridge Racer and Asphalt Injection are both on the Vita as well, they don't look good, and they look better on Vita.  Do you still want me to add those to the lists? (I'm not asking you to add them all, but given you want to make this a Buyer's Guide, it is better to make the lists more even rather than not including games simply because you don't want to or don't think they're good.  That also is a lie anyway because you listed RE: R and said it sucks).

You don't know how to put two and two together?  I made it a point to say I've heard it was a good game.  Obviously when I said nothing is better than the Vita games I've listed, I meant the ones on that list I've played.  (That is in no way obvious.  Try again)

The only unreleased game I listed was Killzone Mercenary, (I didn't notice Atelier Meruru released recently) which I've played so I think it counts.  I don't know if Bravely Default is any good.  The ones that people praise all the time, even though I haven't played them, I listed them and made note that I haven't played them,(you may have listed them, but you discredited them) but only if the games were released.  I originally had God of War Collection and Borderlands 2 on the list, but removed them as I've played t hose games, even if I didn't play them on the Vita, but I decided to be fair since the games aren't even close to release.

Well, seeing that I own both the 3DS and Vita that I've used to play these games, do you know where that bias comes from?  It comes from playing the  games and, you know, the games not being as good. (Clearly, you don't know how bias works if you think that's where it came from)  Usually that's why people don't like games, because the game isn't really good in their opinion. (You may not like a game, but it is pretty clear that it isn't completely because of the game itself.  Try to deny it, but anyone who's played the games you listed can see where I'm coming from) That could be where the bias comes from.  I added one Vita game I haven't played to the list, Rayman Legends while I added more Nintendo games because of how much praise they receive.  I'd say if anything I was more favorable towards Nintendo. (That's why the PS Vita still won in almost every category, right?  Hardware wise, I probably wont argue much with you.  Games?  You may personally not like them, but you have to be as impersonal as possible if you want to make a "Buyer's Guide)

Unfair?  Maybe, though we're dealing with his opinion.  Quite honestly, when broken down by genre that way, I think it's hard to argue that the Vita line-up is very diverse.  Is the format unfair, in that it penalizes the 3DS for having most of its best games in a few genres?  Possibly, though that's still very subjective.

Regardless, I bet a lot of the people flying into an uproar over how "unfair" this thread is say very little when someone else uses the standard "Vita has no games" line, despite that being a clear sign of ignorance.

Anyway, my post was about trolls, not people with legitimate arguments.  Unfortunately, any Vita thread fills up with trolls all rushing to take their shots.

I'm not quite sure I understand.  Are ports automatically bad?

Mario Kart's system is its flaw.  It penalizes better players rather than the entire reason for multiplayer, win because you're the better player.  I didn't add several games on either side because I didn't think of them.  Dragon's Crown is a  great game and I didn't list that anywhere on the Vita section.  I also didn't bother adding games that aren't very good or if I haven't played them heard they aren't very good.  The only racing games I can think of that I've missed on the 3DS is Driver Renegade, Ridge Racer, and Asphalt Injection, haven't played any of them, but Ridge Racer and Asphalt Injection are both on the Vita as well, they don't look good, and they look better on Vita.  Do you still want me to add those to the lists?

I think the point is that including ports of games in a Buyer's Guide makes little sense if you can play it elsewhere.

So those that have a problem with me listing my opinion towards the games, would it be better if the game list was just this?

I'm not quite sure I understand.  Are ports automatically bad?

I'm sorry, but that's a flawed argument.  You can't assume that a person has another system and, even if you could, you can't assume that they would buy it on that other system.  If the comparison is handhelds, then other versions on home consoles are irrelevant.  I've never played Persona 4 until I bought it on the Vita.  Even if I had, the Vita version is superior, as is Muramasa Rebirth or the Vita version of DoA.