By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - 150Mhz CPU boost on XBO, now in production (1.75 GHZ)

ethomaz said:

Ah, the pinnacle of human intelligence at work. Such a beautiful thing.



Around the Network
manny10032 said:
Didn't the FCC peak the PS4's CPU at 2.75Ghz??

2.75Ghz is the GDDR5 memory clock... some guys in GAF are doing the same confusion (I already corrected two)

And now the Xbone goes GOLD they can finally do the FCC certification... what make the Major Nelson comment about before July silly.



ethomaz said:
manny10032 said:
Didn't the FCC peak the PS4's CPU at 2.75Ghz??

2.75Ghz is the GDDR5 memory clock... some guys in GAF are doing the same confusion (I already corrected two)

And now the Xbone goes GOLD they can finally do the FCC certification... what make the Major Nelson comment about before July silly.


Ok, thanks for the clarification. So what is the peak speed for the PS4 CPU?



manny10032 said:

Ok, thanks for the clarification. So what is the peak speed for the PS4 CPU?

The rumors says 1.6Ghz but nothing confirmed... just remember the Jaguar can't go a lot over 2.0Ghz without have big heat/consume issues (I think AnandTech did some tests).





Around the Network
ethomaz said:

sully1311 said:

Where has he said this?

GAF.

He is a little upsert now

"Honestly my friend, if you're still trying to hold onto this rumor at this point, it's just grasping at straws.

ESRAM is *embedded* in the GPU. You don't have yield problems with ESRAM embedded in the GPU then increase the frequency of the GPU. When we increased the frequency of the GPU we also increased the bandwidth of the ESRAM, so they are directly related."

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=79835561&postcount=304


I'm not seeing upset in any of his comments at all. 



ethomaz said:
manny10032 said:
Didn't the FCC peak the PS4's CPU at 2.75Ghz??

2.75Ghz is the GDDR5 memory clock... some guys in GAF are doing the same confusion (I already corrected two)

And now the Xbone goes GOLD they can finally do the FCC certification... what make the Major Nelson comment about before July silly.

Actually is sounds more silly to not already have FCC Certification before going full production.  Would be really expensive if something cropped up and MS had to stop production, fix the issue, retool the plant and fix the already made consoles.  I think its safe to say that MS probably already got certification done already

Just did a quick search on the process and this part stood out

"Confidentiality

The manufacturer may request Confidentiality of the information from the FCC. This usually involves an additional $155 filing fee. If Confidentiality is not requested, all documentation will appear on the FCC website at the time the certification is granted. With the optional fee, the manufacturer can typically eliminate all design documents from this posting process."




thread creator like making negative xbox posts

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags



ethomaz said:

This dude makes Xbox fans look really bad. And I know the Sony side has its fair share of people like this.



ethomaz said:
manny10032 said:
Didn't the FCC peak the PS4's CPU at 2.75Ghz??

2.75Ghz is the GDDR5 memory clock... some guys in GAF are doing the same confusion (I already corrected two)

And now the Xbone goes GOLD they can finally do the FCC certification... what make the Major Nelson comment about before July silly.


Couldn't they have done it in July under the old specs and have to amend the application now to the new ones?