iran have a mutual defence agreement so they would be drwan to war. But i say frack the USA, Europe should declare war on them for breaking the U.N charter, but we wont because we are allies dammit!

Yeah, that's very clear message :D Arm before it's too late.

Economic trouble of such scale that your entire economy collapses and you get a full on revolution/anarchy/starving/instantly-plunged-into-third-world nation. And the defence against that? Nothing. At least missiles can be shot down.

Syria doesn't have anything to do with Iran as it is larger than that. It is to show the world that WMD's are not allowed. It just so happens that Iran is aiming for a nuke at the moment.

Most countries have decided against Syrian intervention except for 2 who want to but haven't yet. France and the United States. Both countrie's governments seem to want to go but Obama is not too sure if to actually go ahead. And if you are fighting against Assad, aren't you on the rebels side even if you don't help them? And you think western news is useless, you believe Assad has used chemical weapons when there is no evidence for it. For all we know, it could be another white lie like when we went to Iraq for supposedly having WMD's. And for all you know, some company could of sold chemical weapons to rebels, if so that has nothing to do with Assad. Because of this confusion, we can't really go to war. Not that we should anyway. The west is almost broke so i don't know why people though another war was ever a good idea.

The whole idea of a country being a world police force is just absurd anyway and it certainly has proven it when it attacked some countries for no reason and ignored others which did worse against "international law" which could never be enforced anyway. I mean who do we think we are to even think of dropping one bomb or send over an army to defeat Assad?, like that would achieve anything. Also, we have our own problems, many problems at home in fact. Why not sort out those, instead of trying to fix someone elses? If we can afford yet another war, we can afford to update our infrastructure, reduce poverty, research new cures and technologies, invest in industry and many other things.     

Ok, first off Nuclear weapons are totally worse then chemical weapons.

Second off, Both are greatly over hyped.

The effects of Nuclear weapons are greatly exaggerated and this was intentional as part of a cold war strategy to make sure they weren't used.

I mean hell, two have been used, and if you look at the scientific tests on them you find that no lasting effects were detectable outside of people in the blast area. Aka, no genetic damage for generations like some people believe, or even one generation. (Outside pregnant women, but pregnant at the time of the blast so i mean really, semantics.)

Chernobyl? Hardly any increase in actual cancer... except throat cancer from the people who drank contaminated milk and water.

What do you mean by your last sentence about China and currency reserve? And what's USG?

USG = US government obviously. He thinks that RMB might replace USD as a global reserve currency, which I doubt it will since Chinese won't be able to support its global status in the nearest future. More likely we see multiple regional reserve currencies including RMB when and if the US will float belly up, and we're far, far from it.

its all propaganda