By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Women and Children First?

attaboy said:
It's okay now, guys. Turns out there were enough life boats for everyone.


Too late, I'm already in the water with a life jacket, a giant sized life jacket on my penis, and 4 giant pairs of titties around my arm, I'm on my way to some island in the middle of nowhere and I wouldn't appreciate it if you rescue me before that.



 

Around the Network

Save the kids first.
Women should get no special treatment. They fought for equality, and they shall receive it. Prioritizing their survival over men is sexism at its murderous worst.



DestructorGT said:
That's what I'm always saying, women want equal rights, but then if sometimes in the future a war started, most of them would not want to be recruited. And about children, yes they are children and our future but how do we know that some of them will not be the next dictator or a serial killer (Hitler and Ted Bundy were also children) . On a sinking ship it should be ''first come, first served''.

That would cause as much deaths as the sinking by itself.

 

OT: I'm with those saying families first and then the rest should follow acording to their age, from younger to older.

Thankfully, nowadays all the cruisers must have enough boats and life jackets for the entire passage and crew.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Me first than the rest. Sorry but my life is more important for me than any other life.



What about a zombie apocalypse where survival for pitiful women/children first doesn't guarantee their survival?



Around the Network
DestructorGT said:
That's what I'm always saying, women want equal rights, but then if sometimes in the future a war started, most of them would not want to be recruited. And about children, yes they are children and our future but how do we know that some of them will not be the next dictator or a serial killer (Hitler and Ted Bundy were also children) . On a sinking ship it should be ''first come, first served''.


The funny thing is many Eastern European countries still haent recovered from war. Their men supply is much lower than the woman.

So I agree woman should go to the next war to even out the numbers. Or they should change loaws to allow men to have up to 4 wives.



 

 

Volunteers followed by adults with terminal diseases should be the lowest priority, while children followed by their caretakers should be top priority. Other than that, age should be the deciding factor. If there is a dispute among people of similar age, their priority should be declared by chance.


A lot of gray areas, yes, but that should be about as fair as it gets.



Well, if you safe kids first, you have to save their parents as well. At the very least, one of the parents and children are usually more attached to the mother so in that aspect, it makes sense. You save the kids and their mothers.

Random women getting priority doesn't make sense, but that's society for ya.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

if im on a ship thats going down and im standing right beside the liferaft you bet your sweet ass im gonna be on it, and when im out in the water ill be singing happy trails to you to all the suckers that didnt make it, heroes are for movies not real life, nothing good ever came from being a hero, just death, and living through the tragedy sounds better than the hero thing, so long suckers!!!



I think the idea is because women can bear children, and it's also polite. As someone else said, mothers should be given priority over those who are not mothers of children.

But back when this guideline was made, the world was not overpopulated. Now it kind of is, but the guideline still remains.



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash