By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Seattle Cop Punches Woman In Face

 

What do you think?

She deserved it. You don't touch a cop 113 73.86%
 
Abuse of assumed 'author... 40 26.14%
 
Total:153
Mythmaker1 said:
Zero999 said:

you said pepper spray can have little to no effect or kill someone, well, so can a punch. but I'm sure the pepper spray will have much less chances of killing her than the free punch.

and please tell me how was she keep restraining him if there's a gun pointed at her?

Police officers don't use guns as detterents. They use it to shoot people.

Officers are trained to only draw their weapon if there is immediate danger, not because they want to intimidate someone into backing down. Not just because it's dangerous, but because it escalates the situation. At that point, the only alternative the police offer has is to holster his gun or fire.

In the end, getting in the way of a police officer trying to do his job should not be tolerated. She had no right to interfere the way she did, and she was brought up on charges and convicted for doing exactly that. The officer, meanwhile, was cleared, and is back on active duty.

the fact someone was "cleared" cleared doesn't magically means  he/she was right.



Around the Network
Zero999 said:
Mythmaker1 said:
Zero999 said:

you said pepper spray can have little to no effect or kill someone, well, so can a punch. but I'm sure the pepper spray will have much less chances of killing her than the free punch.

and please tell me how was she keep restraining him if there's a gun pointed at her?

Police officers don't use guns as detterents. They use it to shoot people.

Officers are trained to only draw their weapon if there is immediate danger, not because they want to intimidate someone into backing down. Not just because it's dangerous, but because it escalates the situation. At that point, the only alternative the police offer has is to holster his gun or fire.

In the end, getting in the way of a police officer trying to do his job should not be tolerated. She had no right to interfere the way she did, and she was brought up on charges and convicted for doing exactly that. The officer, meanwhile, was cleared, and is back on active duty.

the fact someone was "cleared" cleared doesn't magically means  he/she was right.

You've latched onto the most subjective and least important point of that post. A point meant to illustrate that the issue was resolved (which it was, since this was from 2010), not that him being cleared magically means he was right.



I believe in honesty, civility, generosity, practicality, and impartiality.

he is in a clearly hostile group, dealing with a woman who is aggressive and resisting arrest, when he is set upon by another individual. it seems appropriate.

quite frankly, im inclined towards hating police officers, having been violently assaulted by police officers without reason (as a child no less even), but this officer acted in a logical and sensible manner



He doesn't row.

Jakobs. We know if you've got wood in your hand, you're happy.