Are you even aware that different religions have a rather different understanding of "Satan"?
In judaism, the religion that first introduced "Satan", he played hardly any role. He is neither evil nor god's enemy as in christianity, he is kind of one of god's sidekicks, acts under god's commands and his role is something like a public prosecutor who also leads people into temptation.
But anyway, with this being your second "Satan" thread in just two days, I had to think of something Aleister Crowley wrote - the infamous 33rd degree mason who is often considered a satanist:
Atheists are of three kinds.
- The mere stupid man. (Often he is very clever, as Bolingbroke, Bradlaugh and Foote were clever). He has found out one of the minor arcana, and hugs it and despises those who see more than himself, or who regard things from a different standpoint. Hence he is usually a bigot, intolerant even of tolerance.
- The despairing wretch, who, having sought God everywhere, and failed to find Him, thinks everyone else is as blind as he is, and that if he has failed—he, the seeker after truth!—it is because there is no goal. In his cry there is pain, as with the stupid kind of atheist there is smugness and self-satisfaction. Both are diseased Egos.
- The philosophical adept, who, knowing God, says “There is No God,” meaning, “God is Zero,” as qabalistically He is. He holds atheism as a philosophical speculation as good as any other, and perhaps less likely to mislead mankind and do other practical damage as any other. Him you may know by his equanimity, enthusiasm, and devotion. I again refer to Liber 418 for an explanation of this mystery. The nine religions are crowned by the ring of adepts whose password is “There is No God,” so inflected that even the Magister when received among them had not wisdom to interpret it.