By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Tretton: “To Force Every Consumer” To Have a Camera “Ends up Coming up a Little Bit Short”, “It Should be a Choice”

Play4Fun on 01 July 2013
VGKing said:
RolStoppable said:
Tretton is right. Consumers shouldn't be forced to pay for a camera that Sony isn't going to support in any meaningful way.

Exactly. Sony doesn't make kids games, at least not good ones. It's best they stick to what they are good at which is games like The Last of Us.


Camera = for kids games. Good to know.



Around the Network
Darth Tigris on 01 July 2013
RolStoppable said:
Tretton is right. Consumers shouldn't be forced to pay for a camera that Sony isn't going to support in any meaningful way.

Pretty much stopped reading the thread at this point because it won't get any better than this.



tuscaniman99 on 01 July 2013

@enditall727
Because Microsoft wants to sell the most consoles



naruball on 02 July 2013
Zizzla_Rachet said:
naruball said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
When Comparing a massive Failure for two straight generartions to an Industry success.... You should claim that you don't want to force the third iteration of said failure to your customers....Maybe Third time is the charm?....Well Maybe not since it has no games....

Massive failure? Really?  I've noticed that you never post anything positve about Sony and that's fine, but this is really pushing it. It's as crazy as calling eyetoy and move massive success. If anything, both did decent, but not great. There's a huge difference between a product failing to meet a company's high expectations, but still selling tons of copies (e.g. Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, L.A. Noire) and an actual "massive failure", such as "Fuse" or even "Sorcery".

Do you even know how many EyeToys or Moves have been sold/shipped?


I say it's a massive failure due to it's lacks of games...from sony and third parties...I can't even remember any game for it on PS3...And Move Is is a controller..Unless you need to eyetoy to use move which makes it even worse..

Once again you don't show any evidence to support your view. You didn't answer my question about move/eyetoy sales and your point about it's lack of games is vague and weak (bolded). Look up Move enabled or required games on google/wikipedia and you'll see why your view is untenable. There have been tons of games released for the Move, though they didn't do well enough. Again, in no way a "massive failure".



joeorc on 02 July 2013
AgentZorn said:
Why can't I have the choice of being able to play online for free without having PS+ shoved down my throat?

I agree with Tretton, but since you have to pay for online for the PS4 he contradicts his statement.

no it does not contradict his statement,  you can still play free 2 play games like planet side 2, DCUniverse, Warframe etc. without the need of a Playstation Plus being required.



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.