By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

Intel Core i9-10900K 10 core 20 thread CPU Review Leaks Out

https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-10900k-tested-and-compared-with-ryzen-9-3900x-3950x

Trades blows against 3900X generally with a slight advantage at stock clocks in gaming. Most likely will be the new gaming king when overclocked to 5ghz. 3900X beats it in production.

That is one toasty ass power draw Jeez.

Last edited by Jizz_Beard_thePirate - on 18 May 2020

                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Around the Network
Conina said:
Captain_Yuri said:
Seems that a lot of the texture problems for FFVIIR might be due to Ps4 showing it's age and some shitty SE optimization. The port for PC and next gen consoles gonna look god tier.



Also I always kinda want to get one of these handheld PCs:

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/gpd-win-max-handheld-game-console-for-aaa-games#/

But I just might end up getting a Surface instead since that has more functionality. Still for how small they are, they do pack a punch. All these things now need is some Ryzen sauce!

I watched a lot of the prototype videos, tested by The Phawx:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obBLpfRPPrA&list=PLdC3pP79J-A_i2lWYAfFZoJhiZkfDPiQv

Interesting device, but with 800 grams much too heavy for my taste. With this weight, it is a cute mini-PC, but no handheld IMHO.

Same for me. The Wii U gamepad was considered heavy despite weighting only about half of that thing. It's as much a handheld as an XMG Apex is a laptop to play on the go.

Also, it's timing is quite bad, considering how the new Ryzen CPUs mop the floor with Ice Lake both on the CPU and GPU front



zero129 said:
Chazore said:

Seems to happen around the cusp of a new gen every time, so you're not wrong on that one.


I still remember the times when there was talk of 4k gaming on current gen, back in 2013/14, and you also told everyone about it being a thing on PC for years, but it "didn't matter", because it wasn't on X product back then. Now look at the tech that's finally caught up and only now does it somehow matter. 

Back in the PS3-XB360 days it was also a thing on this site only it was with 1080P. To most of the people on this site back then at the time 1080P didnt add anything and 720P was enough.

I remember having countless arguments about how sexy Uncharted 2 would look at the time if it was on PC and could be played in 1080P or higher. Replys where always the same. "1080P or higher wont add anything its still using the same assets etc. PS4 came out and suddenly 1080P mattered to them same gamers. Most of them same people thought Uncharted collection on PS4 looked much better then the PS3 version thanks to running in 1080P too .

Good to know I am not the only individual that noticed this trend of: "It only matters if it's included in my platform of choice."

I heavily ridiculed the 7th gen for their low-resolution, aliased, low-framerate presentations... And yet many individuals thought those visuals were the second coming of Jesus.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

I'm getting tired of all that SSD talk. A decade old technology that only 0.1% of games will make actual use of. But it's somehow a killer app.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Probably cause it's the only "unknown" that Playstation fans have any ground to stand on outside of exclusives. Which one has Better CPU? Series X... Which one has Better GPU? Series X...



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Around the Network

Which has better Ram? Series X...
Which has a better servers and network bandwidth? Series X...

But PC can win on every front if you are willing to pay for it.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Pemalite said:
Which has better Ram? Series X...
Which has a better servers and network bandwidth? Series X...

But PC can win on every front if you are willing to pay for it.

The fun thing is that PC also wins if you're not willing to pay. Considering the crazy PC technology of not having to upgrade your hardware to be allowed to play new games.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:
Pemalite said:
Which has better Ram? Series X...
Which has a better servers and network bandwidth? Series X...

But PC can win on every front if you are willing to pay for it.

The fun thing is that PC also wins if you're not willing to pay. Considering the crazy PC technology of not having to upgrade your hardware to be allowed to play new games.

That too. The old Sandy Bridge 6-core PC that I built a decade ago is going to be gaming for 3x console generations.
Might not be my primary driver anymore, but it's still go some life left in it.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Pemalite said:
vivster said:

The fun thing is that PC also wins if you're not willing to pay. Considering the crazy PC technology of not having to upgrade your hardware to be allowed to play new games.

That too. The old Sandy Bridge 6-core PC that I built a decade ago is going to be gaming for 3x console generations.
Might not be my primary driver anymore, but it's still go some life left in it.

Yeah, if you bought a 3820 8 years ago now you're still good today. And it's only slightly weaker than a 10th Gen i5 despite the selling price at the time wasn't much higher than the one of the i5 10600 today ($283 for the 3820, so just $70 less for the non-K version, and a paltry $20 more than a 10600K today). It's biggest drawback today is probably not it's performance, but that it's on a hopelessy outdated platform.



Bofferbrauer2 said:
Pemalite said:

That too. The old Sandy Bridge 6-core PC that I built a decade ago is going to be gaming for 3x console generations.
Might not be my primary driver anymore, but it's still go some life left in it.

Yeah, if you bought a 3820 8 years ago now you're still good today. And it's only slightly weaker than a 10th Gen i5 despite the selling price at the time wasn't much higher than the one of the i5 10600 today ($283 for the 3820, so just $70 less for the non-K version, and a paltry $20 more than a 10600K today). It's biggest drawback today is probably not it's performance, but that it's on a hopelessy outdated platform.

PCI-E 3.0, Sata 3, DDR3 Quad channel, 3930K.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--