By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Superman Vs. Vegetto

ShinmenTakezo said:
Kasz216 said:

A) I've seen people argue Wolverine would beat Darth Vader in a fight.

B) Superman's Powerlevel fluctatues with his opponent because Superman is always holding back.

C)  DBZ Physical attacks weren't ever really shown to be all that powerful.  They're no stronger then what any average Class 100 Marvel brawler can do.


A) I've heard people argue about plenty of fights between various characters. That doesn't mean the character's power is over or underrated.

B) Where in the comics does it say he is always holding back? The writers of the comic at any given time decide supes power level, that is why it fluctuates. Just like every other comic character in creation that has been portrayed by multiple writers.

C)DBZ character's physical attacks, as well as their durability are augmented by their ki. I don't know what manga you have read, or anime you have watched, but every characters physical abilities is directly related to their ki. They regularly destroy the lanscape around them before launching any type of energy attack. They get flung through mountains and survive. Nappa ripped through planes and ships as if it was nothing. That was way before their fights endangered the planets they took place on. They can survive in 400 x earths gravity + while training. I would say they are pretty freakin durable.


Thanks for saying that. It's about time someone mentioned it.



Around the Network

I think that Vegetto wins



ShinmenTakezo said:
Kasz216 said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
Kasz216 said:

Eh. What people don't get about the Dragonball Z Universe is that their physical stats greatly lag behind their Ki output stats.

Master Roshi can planet bust a moon... while his physical stats are WELL below your average character with super strength. Yet his punches deal about the same level damage to an opponent as his energy attacks.

Ki attacks either are largely ineffective on people, or martial artists in the dragon ball Z Universe develop some level of innate ki resistance from their training.


Physically Superman just outclasses him too much... and also, honestly probably outclasses him in energy projection. (though not by nearly as much.)


Superman has never destroyed a planet... but he's Superman. Why would he.  (He has destroyed a moon through in a manner like friexa, but just through pure strength.



It's worth noting that his heat vision is hotter then the sun which has been shown as something that can kill DBZ characters with ease, and he's used this heat vision before to move planets.... while under a red sun (which HUGELY weakens his powers), he's covered an entire planet in heat vision and can burrow through earth far faster then Freeza's core detroying energy blasts can. (Who is well well below Vegito, but it's just pointing out how Frieza's planet busting feats aren't in the least impressive vs superman.)  His heat vision is generally considered stronger then his fists.  (It's also a burning/drilling type energy, not explosive like DBZ.)

 

 

I'm no great fan of superman, but he should take a battle vs any DBZ character pretty handily.  The only chance Vegito would have is Superman's innate "carefulness/stupidity" in combat.

He tries to fight to his opponents level to avoid hurting them, so if he H2H's vs Vegito for a while and ends up unharmed and assusming Vegito is completely weak, he might be stupid enough to take a planet busting blast head on without dodging.  Of course Vegito isn't known for his smart fighting either.  Seemingly combining the worst aspects of both characters.  The Arrogance of Vegeta with the Playfullness of Goku.

If we're talking each character wants to take the other down/kill each other/doesn't hold back.

Superman is just too fast, two strong and his heat vision is something Vegito just can't stand up against.

Or he could just fly goku into space if they fight in an uninhabited universe.  Superman can hold his breath and there would be noone Vegito coud Instant Transmission to.

Of course a full powered superman would be a boring fight/character, since he'd just lobotomize all of his enemies from orbit.  Like Justice Lords superman.

 


Dragonball Z Characters are a lot  like Wolverine, in that their power is greatly overrated.  It's just worse because unlike Wolverine, DBZ characters have high levels of power.

Just not Superman/Silver Surfer levels of power.

The DBZ characters durability increases with their power level. It has been displayed time and time again. The original dragon ball, where the characters powers were just past elite martial artists, goku took an axe to the head and the axe broke. When a character is more powerful than another, the stronger character shrugs off and absorbs all physical attacks. Attacks strong enough to reduce mountains to rubble.

Superman's power and durability have fluctuated greatly throughout time. The thing is no matter how strong the opponent, he is portrayed as a physical match usually.

I also strongly dissagree that Wolverine's power is overrated. I think it is greatly underrated, but that is a discusion for another thread.

A) I've seen people argue Wolverine would beat Darth Vader in a fight.

B) Superman's Powerlevel fluctatues with his opponent because Superman is always holding back.

C)  DBZ Physical attacks weren't ever really shown to be all that powerful.  They're no stronger then what any average Class 100 Marvel brawler can do.


A) I've heard people argue about plenty of fights between various characters. That doesn't mean the character's power is over or underrated.

B) Where in the comics does it say he is always holding back? The writers of the comic at any given time decide supes power level, that is why it fluctuates. Just like every other comic character in creation that has been portrayed by multiple writers.

C)DBZ character's physical attacks, as well as their durability are augmented by their ki. I don't know what manga you have read, or anime you have watched, but every characters physical abilities is directly related to their ki. They regularly destroy the lanscape around them before launching any type of energy attack. They get flung through mountains and survive. Nappa ripped through planes and ships as if it was nothing. That was way before their fights endangered the planets they took place on. They can survive in 400 x earths gravity + while training. I would say they are pretty freakin durable.


A)  Sure it does?  Darth Vader is so ridiculiously over Wolverine it isn't even funny.  In general people wolverine can punch a lot higher out of his league then he really can.

B)  EVERYWHERE, that's pretty much his entire gimic.  That he lives ina  world made of stereofome.  

C) 400X Earths gravity is really nothing when talking about Herald level Superheros.  Again,  if dragonball Z characters had Superman level durability they'd never be hurt by each other, as there physical attacks really don't do any more noticeable damage then say.... Colossus from the X-men.

Superman has survived black holes.  Hell he's held black holes in his hand.

The center of a Black hole has INFINITE density.   Think about that for a second.  It's not that Dragonball Z characters are weak.  It's that your amazingly underestimating just how strong superman is.

The difference between Crisis and Pre-Crisis Superman isn't as big as most people think. 

 



Kasz216 said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
Kasz216 said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
Kasz216 said:

 

A) I've seen people argue Wolverine would beat Darth Vader in a fight.

B) Superman's Powerlevel fluctatues with his opponent because Superman is always holding back.

C)  DBZ Physical attacks weren't ever really shown to be all that powerful.  They're no stronger then what any average Class 100 Marvel brawler can do.


A) I've heard people argue about plenty of fights between various characters. That doesn't mean the character's power is over or underrated.

B) Where in the comics does it say he is always holding back? The writers of the comic at any given time decide supes power level, that is why it fluctuates. Just like every other comic character in creation that has been portrayed by multiple writers.

C)DBZ character's physical attacks, as well as their durability are augmented by their ki. I don't know what manga you have read, or anime you have watched, but every characters physical abilities is directly related to their ki. They regularly destroy the lanscape around them before launching any type of energy attack. They get flung through mountains and survive. Nappa ripped through planes and ships as if it was nothing. That was way before their fights endangered the planets they took place on. They can survive in 400 x earths gravity + while training. I would say they are pretty freakin durable.


A)  Sure it does?  Darth Vader is so ridiculiously over Wolverine it isn't even funny.  In general people wolverine can punch a lot higher out of his league then he really can.

B)  EVERYWHERE, that's pretty much his entire gimic.  That he lives ina  world made of stereofome.  

C) 400X Earths gravity is really nothing when talking about Herald level Superheros.  Again,  if dragonball Z characters had Superman level durability they'd never be hurt by each other, as there physical attacks really don't do any more noticeable damage then say.... Colossus from the X-men.

Superman has survived black holes.  Hell he's held black holes in his hand.

The center of a Black hole has INFINITE density.   Think about that for a second.  It's not that Dragonball Z characters are weak.  It's that your amazingly underestimating just how strong superman is.

The difference between Crisis and Pre-Crisis Superman isn't as big as most people think. 

 

A)If Wolverine can take on the Hulk, I think he can take on pretty much anyone. That is official cannon that he can go toe to toe with the hulk, and sometimes best him. Wolverine is very underrated compared to the feats he has acomplished.

B)You obviusly don't read the comics because Superman bruises, bleeds and breaks also. As long as you are strong enough, or posess magic, you can damage supes. Just like DBZ characters, you have to exert enough force to damage them, otherwise they are invulerable, just like supes. Like I stated before, Superman's abilities vary from writer to writer. Sometimes he can do the things you describe, sometimes he can't. It all depends on the current writers whim. Not your personal opinion. As you have stated earlier the DC universe isn't based in reality so saying because a black whole has infinite density (which I don't believe true, but I'm no scientist) is moot by your own standards. When you start writhing Superman comics, then you can start telling people Superman's powers and differences between all of the iterations. Until then it is speculation. Think about that for a second.



ShinmenTakezo said:
 

A)If Wolverine can take on the Hulk, I think he can take on pretty much anyone. That is official cannon that he can go toe to toe with the hulk, and sometimes best him. Wolverine is very underrated compared to the feats he has acomplished.

B)You obviusly don't read the comics because Superman bruises, bleeds and breaks also. As long as you are strong enough, or posess magic, you can damage supes. Just like DBZ characters, you have to exert enough force to damage them, otherwise they are invulerable, just like supes. Like I stated before, Superman's abilities vary from writer to writer. Sometimes he can do the things you describe, sometimes he can't. It all depends on the current writers whim. Not your personal opinion. As you have stated earlier the DC universe isn't based in reality so saying because a black whole has infinite density (which I don't believe true, but I'm no scientist) is moot by your own standards. When you start writhing Superman comics, then you can start telling people Superman's powers and differences between all of the iterations. Until then it is speculation. Think about that for a second.


A) When has he ever won against the hulk?  He's hung with the hulk often in fights, due to his regeneration... butthe Hulk pretty much just stomps him.

In reality though, wolverine would get his shit handed to him by Spiderman.

B) He's had low end showings.  That happens in comic books.  Hell that happens in Dragonball Z.  Remember when krillin hits a sleeping Goku with a rock and goku freaks out like someone had just broken his leg.  In general, you go by what's more consinstantly shown.  Is Super Saiyan Goku really so weak that a rock will hurt him?

 

B2) Any scientist will tell you the center of a blackhole = infintie density.  Infinite Gravity too...

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/010912a.html

makes 400X earth's gravity look downright silly.



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:


A) When has he ever won against the hulk?  He's hung with the hulk often in fights, due to his regeneration... butthe Hulk pretty much just stomps him.

In reality though, wolverine would get his shit handed to him by Spiderman.

B) He's had low end showings.  That happens in comic books.  Hell that happens in Dragonball Z.  Remember when krillin hits a sleeping Goku with a rock and goku freaks out like someone had just broken his leg.  In general, you go by what's more consinstantly shown.  Is Super Saiyan Goku really so weak that a rock will hurt him?

 

Wild Krillen used rock throw

It's super effective!

everyone knows that Super Saiyans are weak to rocks. Adult Gohan was afraid of Goten when he was throwing just rocks at him, when at the time he could easily take planet busting attacks.



Kasz216 said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
 

A)If Wolverine can take on the Hulk, I think he can take on pretty much anyone. That is official cannon that he can go toe to toe with the hulk, and sometimes best him. Wolverine is very underrated compared to the feats he has acomplished.

B)You obviusly don't read the comics because Superman bruises, bleeds and breaks also. As long as you are strong enough, or posess magic, you can damage supes. Just like DBZ characters, you have to exert enough force to damage them, otherwise they are invulerable, just like supes. Like I stated before, Superman's abilities vary from writer to writer. Sometimes he can do the things you describe, sometimes he can't. It all depends on the current writers whim. Not your personal opinion. As you have stated earlier the DC universe isn't based in reality so saying because a black whole has infinite density (which I don't believe true, but I'm no scientist) is moot by your own standards. When you start writhing Superman comics, then you can start telling people Superman's powers and differences between all of the iterations. Until then it is speculation. Think about that for a second.


A) When has he ever won against the hulk?  He's hung with the hulk often in fights, due to his regeneration... butthe Hulk pretty much just stomps him.

In reality though, wolverine would get his shit handed to him by Spiderman.

B) He's had low end showings.  That happens in comic books.  Hell that happens in Dragonball Z.  Remember when krillin hits a sleeping Goku with a rock and goku freaks out like someone had just broken his leg.  In general, you go by what's more consinstantly shown.  Is Super Saiyan Goku really so weak that a rock will hurt him?

 

B2) Any scientist will tell you the center of a blackhole = infintie density.  Infinite Gravity too...

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/010912a.html

makes 400X earth's gravity look downright silly.

Wolverine has fought the Hulk on many occasions, and Hulk doesn't destroy him. Wolverine has beat the hulk. If you take the feats Wolverine has accomplished, he could beat spidey........... in reality.....LOL. We're talking about fictional characters, with nonexistent abilities, in a made up universe that has its own set of rules seperate from ours, there is no "in reality," it is all just speculation and opinion. Wolverine has to be around Luke Cage's strength level (imo), but is portrayed as having barely above human level strength.

If you want to go by what is generally shown power wise, then you just proved yourself wrong. DBZ characters are consistently portrayed as invulnerable against anything not at their power level. Even physical things like guns augment power levels in the DBZ universe.

You contradict yourself with trying to compare real science with DC universe science when you yourself said real world science is irrelevant in a discussion on DC universe science. I'm refering to your speed force argument.

This is just a question, but wouldn't it be theoretically impossible to have a black hole with infinite gravity? I heard that a back hole can only consume a certain amount of matter and its based on its own mass, I think. I was watching something on Discovery about black holes. If a black hole had infinite gravity, then wouldn't the whole universe colapse into it? There are different size black holes with different feeding cycles. Hell, there is a black hole at the center of every galaxy. Wouldn't we all be sucked into the black holes if they had infinite gravity? Wouldn't they all be the same size and mass since all black holes have infinite gravity?



Kasz216 said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
 

 

 

B2) Any scientist will tell you the center of a blackhole = infintie density.  Infinite Gravity too...

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/010912a.html

makes 400X earth's gravity look downright silly.

Density isn't the same as gravity and isn't directly related to gravity in any way. Also I think it is impossible to have infinite density because density is the measurement of the amount of matter in a given space. density=mass/volume. You can't have an infinite amount of matter in a defined amount of space. That matter, once it gets to a certain point is going to require more space.

Gravity is directly related to an objects mass. Therefore if you have a defined mass, you will have a defined gravitational force. That means you can't have infinite gravity without infinte mass. You can't have infinite mass without infinite space. I am no scientist, but this is the conclusion I come to using the science I have learned.



ShinmenTakezo said:
Kasz216 said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
 

 

 

B2) Any scientist will tell you the center of a blackhole = infintie density.  Infinite Gravity too...

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/010912a.html

makes 400X earth's gravity look downright silly.

Density isn't the same as gravity and isn't directly related to gravity in any way. Also I think it is impossible to have infinite density because density is the measurement of the amount of matter in a given space. density=mass/volume. You can't have an infinite amount of matter in a defined amount of space. That matter, once it gets to a certain point is going to require more space.

Gravity is directly related to an objects mass. Therefore if you have a defined mass, you will have a defined gravitational force. That means you can't have infinite gravity without infinte mass. You can't have infinite mass without infinite space. I am no scientist, but this is the conclusion I come to using the science I have learned.

Plus, in the comic books they make a black holes sucking capacity, well that of a child's imagination about how powerful a black hole can suck. It's not even the same kind of black holes as real life.

Plus I believe Superman fly's by controlling his own gravity, which means he can fly away from a black hole by having his own gravity be infinite gravity at the opposite direction, but at a faster rate, to escape anything that would have infinite gravity.

 

 

 

I think Man of Steel Superman, might be the weakest suited Superman I have ever seen, but he doesn't seem to really have grasp of his own strength in a lot of the movie.



ShinmenTakezo said:
Kasz216 said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
 

 

B2) Any scientist will tell you the center of a blackhole = infintie density.  Infinite Gravity too...

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/010912a.html

makes 400X earth's gravity look downright silly.

Density isn't the same as gravity and isn't directly related to gravity in any way. Also I think it is impossible to have infinite density because density is the measurement of the amount of matter in a given space. density=mass/volume. You can't have an infinite amount of matter in a defined amount of space. That matter, once it gets to a certain point is going to require more space.

Gravity is directly related to an objects mass. Therefore if you have a defined mass, you will have a defined gravitational force. That means you can't have infinite gravity without infinte mass. You can't have infinite mass without infinite space. I am no scientist, but this is the conclusion I come to using the science I have learned.

That's all well and good.  Except the astrophysisit in the link i posted disagrees with you.

(They mention the whole infinite gravity thing there too.