By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Sony not "Defensive" or "Apologetic" about PS4 Multiplayer: except Yoshida

 

Is it reasonable?

Yes 174 69.05%
 
No 76 30.16%
 
Total:250

Sony not “Defensive” or “Apologetic” about PS4 Multiplayer Costing Money With PS+, Due to “Very Significant Step-Change in the Online Experience”

June 11, 2013 Written by Sebastian Moss *EDITED FOR LENGTH*

*CUT*

Jim Ryan, president of SCEE, told VG247:

The online experience on PS3 has got better, but at the beginning it was rather rudimentary, and the investment associated with it reflected that.

We are going to make a very significant step-change in the online experience with PlayStation 4. Some of that functionality was spoken about yesterday, and some on February 20, and that’s all great and we’re really happy that we’re able to make our online experience much more competitive, but the flipside is that this stuff comes at a cost. When you’re trying to achieve a $399/£349 price-point and trying to deliver all this functionality, the money has to come from somewhere.

He added that the best way to get subscribers in a ‘good’ way would be to add it in to PS+:

It seemed to us that the most appropriate way to do this was to put online multiplayer into the existing PS Plus package, and, like some other platforms, for something like €5, or whatever the sterling equivalent, per month, yes, there is a charge for online multiplayer, but there’s also a pretty damn strong package of content and services in there. As you’ll know, it’s pretty good.

Adding:

I think we’ve done it in a reasonable and fair manner, and I don’t feel defensive in sitting here and looking at the whole package. Yes, we’re charging for online multiplayer, and we have to be quite straight about that and not hide it at all. It is part of PlayStation Plus, and all the good stuff that goes with that. Set that against the competitive offering and the overall value proposition that it’ll provide UK consumers, and I don’t feel bad about it at all. I don’t feel apologetic.

*CUT*

SOURCE: http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2013/06/11/sony-not-defensive-or-apologetic-about-ps4-multiplayer-costing-money-with-ps-due-to-very-significant-step-change-in-the-online-experience/

 

IN ADDITION

Yoshida seems to care. Also outlining what non plus member get and its not bad.

He also went as far as to apologize for placing an additional cost on the customers’ wallets:

I apologize for the financial burden on our users, but on PS4 it’ll also provide early access to beta versions, free games and discounts like on PS3 and PS Vita. In addition to that PS Plus members will receive for free a special edition with slightly reduced functions of DriveClub.


http://www.dualshockers.com/2013/06/12/e3-2013-sonys-shuhei-yoshida-shares-relevant-details-on-playstation-plus-requirement-for-multiplayer-on-ps4/



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Around the Network

They have no reason to be either one of those.

Anyone who was paying attention couldve called they would charge. In fact I called it back in February. MS got away with it this entire generation and the cost of maintaining the entire infrastructure is huge. As soon as Sony created Plus I knew pay to play was coming.

And its a solid business decision.



I wonder if you could still use things like Netflix without a PS+ account? That's more annoying to me than paying to play online.



Can't find source right now, but they did say Netflix and such would stay free. It's only for online play.



That's right, just one "d"

In b4 "it's addict"
-----------------------------------------------
Add me:


Normando said:
I wonder if you could still use things like Netflix without a PS+ account? That's more annoying to me than paying to play online.


Yes they announced all services would remain free. Online play has the pay wall if heard correctly.



Around the Network
gamesadict said:

Can't find source right now, but they did say Netflix and such would stay free. It's only for online play.

If that's true, than I have no complaints then. PS+ is a great value as it is.



Normando said:
I wonder if you could still use things like Netflix without a PS+ account? That's more annoying to me than paying to play online.


Yes you can use services like Netflix, hulu, etc without a PS+ Subscription

 

IGN   "At its E3 press briefing, Sony confirmed that PlayStation 4 will require PlayStation Plus in order to play games online. This is similar to Microsoft's current approach to online gaming with Xbox Live Gold. At the same time, Sony also confirmed that you'll be able to play all single-player games as well as use all media services without subscribing to PS+. Your current PS3 membership will transfer over to PS4."

Source: http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/11/e3-2013-playstation-plus-required-for-ps4-online-play



As I was watching the conference I actually said to myself I am getting plus just because Sony is doing what's good for the consumer. I did not even hear the MP would be only for plus.

Do I think it sucks? Yes. Do I think it's worth it? He'll yes. Especially with the bonuses that are offered and I get to support a company that is supporting my hobby.



I didnt care that people needed to pay for Xbox live and I dont care that Sony is now charging for Multiplayer, this will help the PSN network grow and evolve + make it more competitive against Xbox live. As pointed out in previous posts the costs for running this type of infrastructure is massive, $60 is only 5 dollars a month and factor in you get free games and many other options with the subscription.



 

Check out my Youtube channel : http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePSXcollector

is it reasonable yes does it suck yes will I get over it yes



THe oNLY TRue STuPiDiTY iS THe aCCePTaNCe oF iGNoRaNCe 

PSNTAG K_I_N_G__COKE

  The King Of The Iron Fist tournament