Forums - Gaming Discussion - Nintendo is the only one who has balls

the latest rumours say that Sony had also plans for DRM but hold them because of the reactions after the XBone reveal! They might or might not be giving it to that but thats not the matter right now!

it is no wonder why EA dropped the online pass system. The XBone will have DRM and such don't require these online passes. The question is:

Have EA done this decision only for 1 console? I think NOT!

 

Without Sony on the DRM train, EA wouldn't have abandoned online passes. Its easy to let Nintendo in the dust because they won't get as much third party support as the other consoles devs.

the point is: with Sony holding their plans for DRM, EA is rethinking their strategy thus admit after the XBOne reveal that they would work at Nintendo titles. It is up to Sony and their decision.

 

That is complete bullshit what is going on! I'm disgusted with this industry right now! I'm more disgusted by many people here in this very forum who praise Sony to the death and give Nintendo zero shits. Nintendo was in my eyes the ONLY company who don't give in to EA mad game by not letting them put origin on their system. That would have made DRM on the Wii U available and EA would make more games for the Wii U.

NIntendo is the only ones who has the balls to do that! Everybody who praise Sony should or rather must praise NIntendo AT LEAST equally. Things people criticise about other console are a naturalness for Nintendo: Backwards compatibility, support of last gens controller, no not supporting used games! no paying extra for play used games! no mandatory installation of games. The Wii U may be weaker than its competitors and hasn't had a game in the last months but games will come and they will be amazing! 

people should learn not to support these stupid decisions made by greedy companies and not to buy them in order to let them know that they can't bullshit us! For the sakemof all of us I hope that Sony won't give in to DRM....Its just not worth it!

 

...and its a shame Nintendo don't get the proper credits they deserve! 

 

I'm out...peace!



Around the Network
I said roughly the same thing in my thread but I got told I was wrong so...yay?

PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

If only they fixed 3rd party support. :(


Ajescent said:
I said roughly the same thing in my thread but I got told I was wrong so...yay?


blasphemy! nobody wants to hear the truth! 



Sony maintains good relation with third parties yet they wouldn't kiss ass.

Microsoft maintains good relation with third parties and they do kiss ass.

Nintendo doesn't have good relations with third parties but its not just because they're ballsy. Nintendo are aware that what brings them success isn't outsiders' but their own products. They can compete with Sony and Microsoft simply by making Pokemon and Mario games. A slight Third Party support should be enough to push their hardware.

Nintendo doesn't look for Third Parties, it's Third Parties who look for Nintendo.

Behold!! The Edward Newgate Household!

http://s21.postimg.org/r6vbjpbh2/shekshi_desu.jpg

Around the Network
Im 100% behind you !

Hear hear!

I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

The situation that's developing is likely to be very amusing. Right now Microsoft's used game policy is very unpopular. Lots of Sony fans getting behind the PS4 as a last bastion of real gaming.

When it turns out Sony is implementing a similar used game policy with PS4, I expect to see a lot of those same people start touting the advantages of such a policy, how it benefits the developers and publishers, and how Nintendo is obviously still lagging behind, stuck in last-gen for not embracing the mandatory-online, restricted-used-games future.

Hopefully no part of that comes to pass, but I wouldn't be surprised.



Even a bluff would suit me just fine...

the_dengle said:

The situation that's developing is likely to be very amusing. Right now Microsoft's used game policy is very unpopular. Lots of Sony fans getting behind the PS4 as a last bastion of real gaming.

When it turns out Sony is implementing a similar used game policy with PS4, I expect to see a lot of those same people start touting the advantages of such a policy, how it benefits the developers and publishers, and how Nintendo is obviously still lagging behind, stuck in last-gen for not embracing the mandatory-online, restricted-used-games future.

Hopefully no part of that comes to pass, but I wouldn't be surprised.


To be honest I can see that happen. It sounds crazy but so many people are blinded with fanboyism that it wouldn't matter to them.



Around the Network
Nintendo has balls all right, but it just cost them major 3rd party support.

___________

Pretend Exclusive: A 3rd party multiplat, that releases for multiple consoles in the same window, in which all press showings and marketing are catered to only one console. Exclusive console bundles, being the lead platform, as well as timed exclusive/exclusive  betas and game content also strengthen the claim. The final effect is that the uninformed gamer will be convinced that the version primarily advertised is the only and/or best place to experience the game.

X1: Titanfall, COD: AW.    PS4: Watch Dogs, Destiny

Xbox E3 Exclusives: Halo MCC, Crackdown 3, Phantom Dust, Scalebound, Dance Central Spotlight