By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - FIRST inFamous Second Son screens

riderz13371 on 09 May 2013
CGI-Quality said:
crissindahouse said:
CGI-Quality said:
crissindahouse said:

asked that already but i will try once more. does anybody know which resolution and fps the game will have? if it will run with 60fps it's already very impressive for an early next gen title with open world. 720p and 30fps would be less impressive but still better as every other open world game on consoles.

I'm betting on 1080p @ 30fps (smooth, like the Uncharted games). 

wouldn't 60fps and 720p make more sense for this game or doesn't it need 60fps? i have not really a clue about infamous but i thought it's one of those games which would profit from more frames.

What would make snese is 1080p @ 60fps, but things aren't always so perfect.

For this type of game, 30fps (smooth - remember) should suffice.

I'm pretty sure inFamous 1 and 2 ran at 30 FPS and I've platinumed both those games. Never really had an issue with frame rate. It all looked fine to me.



Around the Network
riderz13371 on 09 May 2013
ethomaz said:

riderz13371 said:

You haven't even played this character Ethomaz! How would you know if you don't like him =(.

Also I love your english =P. It's like a puzzle trying to figure out what you're trying to say haha =P

It is not about gameplay... it is more about the character design... the first Cole is still the best and cool character desing.

Yeah Cole McGrath is bad ass. Let's hope Delsin is also bad ass when it comes to the types of powers he can use. Smoke is certainly an interesting choice! I feel it's going to be more difficult this time around to gather the energy like you had to do with the inFamous games. Electricy is everywhere in inFamous 1+2 for Cole to absord but where the hell is Delsin gonna find smoke?!



crissindahouse on 09 May 2013
riderz13371 said:
CGI-Quality said:
 

What would make snese is 1080p @ 60fps, but things aren't always so perfect.

For this type of game, 30fps (smooth - remember) should suffice.

I'm pretty sure inFamous 1 and 2 ran at 30 FPS and I've platinumed both those games. Never really had an issue with frame rate. It all looked fine to me.

well, i thought it's like with racing or sports games which can profit a lot from higher frame rates but like i said, i have no clue about infamous. just read that the ps3 games had 30fps but people say "it felt like 60fps from time to time". maybe it's the smoothy thing



o_O.Q on 09 May 2013
Sol said:
Looks great to me. Hope its a launch title.

Bit sad to see insecure 'fans' bring other users appreciation of Nintendo into this though.


you mean even when the nintendo fan in quesion has been making it a habit recently to troll playstation threads?



riderz13371 on 09 May 2013
crissindahouse said:
riderz13371 said:
CGI-Quality said:
 

What would make snese is 1080p @ 60fps, but things aren't always so perfect.

For this type of game, 30fps (smooth - remember) should suffice.

I'm pretty sure inFamous 1 and 2 ran at 30 FPS and I've platinumed both those games. Never really had an issue with frame rate. It all looked fine to me.

well, i thought it's like with racing or sports games which can profit a lot from higher frame rates but like i said, i have no clue about infamous. just read that the ps3 games had 30fps but people say "it felt like 60fps from time to time". maybe it's the smoothy thing

Yeah I personally never had a problem with the FPS in the inFamous games. Maybe it was 30 but it felt extremely smooth to me even when there was a lot going on (explosions etc).



Around the Network
SnakeDrake on 09 May 2013
riderz13371 said:
CGI-Quality said:
crissindahouse said:
CGI-Quality said:
crissindahouse said:

asked that already but i will try once more. does anybody know which resolution and fps the game will have? if it will run with 60fps it's already very impressive for an early next gen title with open world. 720p and 30fps would be less impressive but still better as every other open world game on consoles.

I'm betting on 1080p @ 30fps (smooth, like the Uncharted games). 

wouldn't 60fps and 720p make more sense for this game or doesn't it need 60fps? i have not really a clue about infamous but i thought it's one of those games which would profit from more frames.

What would make snese is 1080p @ 60fps, but things aren't always so perfect.

For this type of game, 30fps (smooth - remember) should suffice.

I'm pretty sure inFamous 1 and 2 ran at 30 FPS and I've platinumed both those games. Never really had an issue with frame rate. It all looked fine to me.

Only poblems were a few textre pop ups, but its not major the games still has great draw distance. 



 

Bet with gooch_destroyer, he wins if FFX and FFX-2 will be at $40 each for the vita. I win if it dont

Sign up if you want to see God Eater 2 get localized!! https://www.change.org/petitions/shift-inc-bring-god-eater-2-to-north-america-2#share

nnodley on 09 May 2013
riderz13371 said:
ethomaz said:

riderz13371 said:

You haven't even played this character Ethomaz! How would you know if you don't like him =(.

Also I love your english =P. It's like a puzzle trying to figure out what you're trying to say haha =P

It is not about gameplay... it is more about the character design... the first Cole is still the best and cool character desing.

Yeah Cole McGrath is bad ass. Let's hope Delsin is also bad ass when it comes to the types of powers he can use. Smoke is certainly an interesting choice! I feel it's going to be more difficult this time around to gather the energy like you had to do with the inFamous games. Electricy is everywhere in inFamous 1+2 for Cole to absord but where the hell is Delsin gonna find smoke?!

Don't forget Delsin can absorb other conduit's power's.  Now if we get to have them all at our disposable all at once still remains to be seen. 



nnodley on 09 May 2013

Can you say best beanie in a video game ever!!

Also I'm pretty sure Infamous 2 had an unlocked frame rate and ran occasionally at 60fps. Not sure about the first though. I'm sure if the second one did have an unlocked frame rate, then I'll bet that Second Son will be like that also.



Hynad on 10 May 2013

If the game is 30 fps without any frame drop at all, then the experience feels really smooth. As long as the frame rate is locked at a multiple of 30, then it's really good to the eye.

I'm playing Wind Waker right now, and even if it's locked at 30 fps, it feels really, really smooth.

60 fps is good when timing is essential, like in fighting games and FPS games. But for third person games like infamous or Uncharted, locked 30fps is more than enough.



crissindahouse on 10 May 2013
Hynad said:

If the game is 30 fps without any frame drop at all, then the experience feels really smooth. As long as the frame rate is locked at a multiple of 30, then it's really good to the eye.

I'm playing Wind Waker right now, and even if it's locked at 30 fps, it feels really, really smooth.

60 fps is good when timing is essential, like in fighting games and FPS games. But for third person games like infamous or Uncharted, locked 30fps is more than enough.

that's why i asked, i know all the stuff about the frames and the advantages but i thought timing is essential in infamous but maybe i was wrong with that (that's why i said "like in racing or sports games")

yeah,  i don't know much about this franchise