No if you only look at what's profitable or not.

Yes if you want to expand your franchises and reach as many people as you can, giving you the option to expand the existing consumers.

btw the whole article is based on a few threads we had here the last weeks, it even mentions vgchartz numbers. seems like the guy just read the threads and put all complaints together in one article^^

I guess being forced to use the gamepad second screen annoys EA?

when did Nintendo force people to do that? you can use buttons only you know

but the second screens NEEDS to offer something gameplay wise.

Does this type of behavior coming from EA really surprise anyone anymore? It's pretty much expected by now.

Depends on what you mean by the worst company. They're certainly the least respected publisher by people working in the industry, they treat their staff like shite.

Worst gaming company sure, though I'd say its nearly impossible for EA to ever be as horrible as companies like Comcast or Bank of America.

That's not true at all. Plenty of games just stick an image or map on the screen and call it a day, or just have it mimic the TV screen. Nintendo never made the edict that games must utilize the Gamepad screen for gameplay purposes.

no it does not. It can be a logo if they choose to