By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - How much money Sony really lost with the PS3

archbrix said:
Max King of the Wild said:
archbrix said:

Can we now expect a thread from you on southern population too?

Are you going to argue that most people who live in the south dont live in texas?

Oh no, I wouldn't think of it.  Besides, I've already given you a win on the topic of generic soft drink names.  After all, it's the least I can do.  

You should also give me a point for proving Slowmo is paranoid when it comes to Ps3 fans too since I have provided evidence for that. And then admit I know what I'm talking about and most people in NA don't call gaming devices xbox.



Around the Network

The Ps3 had a large loss then the original XBox. The XBox 360 was profitable in it's 3rd year. With XBox Live subscription it was even more profitable. The PS3 was a complete failure in terms of making Sony money. Sure it sold a lot of units and is catching up the XBox 360 in sales finally, but it lossed a lot of money and a lot of market shares over the last 6 years. Even those M$ Kinect didn't have an abundance of killer titles, it still sold more then the MOVE and sold more software then the MOVE as well. The Kinect was released after the MOVE.



__________________________________________

'gaming till I'm gone'

Max King of the Wild said:
archbrix said:
Max King of the Wild said:
archbrix said:

Can we now expect a thread from you on southern population too?

Are you going to argue that most people who live in the south dont live in texas?

Oh no, I wouldn't think of it.  Besides, I've already given you a win on the topic of generic soft drink names.  After all, it's the least I can do.  

You should also give me a point for proving Slowmo is paranoid when it comes to Ps3 fans too since I have provided evidence for that. And then admit I know what I'm talking about and most people in NA don't call gaming devices xbox.

Sorry, but I don't see paranoia in the evidence against Slowmo.

And regarding gaming terminology I don't have a map, but I know what the popular console brand is here in the US. When people not informed enough to refer to a specific game console mention games, they usually say "Xbox". It's not as common to hear "Playstation" in this context anymore. When they show a game system in a TV show, it's usually a 360 (or Wii for a while), but rarely is it a PS3. So unless you have another map proving otherwise, I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul.



CGI-Quality said:
Mr Puggsly said:
CGI-Quality said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I don't know what you're babbling about.

So I'll just say again. A cheaper Xbox 360 and some nice bundle software with the entry model would have boosted sales.

MS didn't really if PS3 surpassed the 360 in overall sales so it didn't happen.

I'm sorry you mistake reality for "babbling", but it is what it is. If I'm wrong, then how do you explain the higher priced PS3 outselling its closest competition? 

Also, whether Microsoft "cared"  if the PS3 ever passed their product or not is irrelevant (though I agree that at this point, they probably don't). If it was going to happen, I firmly believe that more price cuts may have only gotten them so far. 

No, your babbling is just your opinion. The Elite 360 cost more than a PS3.  The entry model includes no HDD or games.

For the record, I'm just saying further price cuts to the 360 would have slowed the gap from closing. Why is that getting you so worked up?

Worked up? Don't see it, but you certainly seem so, given your improper (and random) use of the word "babbling".

Anyway, the 360 has been cheaper than the PS3 throughout the gen, hurting Sony most in the US (your vague example doesn't change this fact). That considered, it has been able to claw back much of the lead the 360 gained and will overtake it in total, worldwide numbers.

To me, that means that, at this juncture, the PS3 is the more desired product.

No, you were babbling.

I'm not denying that the bolded part. I'm just saying MS could have slowed the gap from closing. But you can't seem to get through your head that's all I'm saying. Further price could have done it.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Stinky said:
The word is phyrric.


hey thats not a word!



All of this, of course, is just my opinion.

Skyrim 100%'d. Dark Souls 100%'d. 
Dark Souls > Skyrim.
Halo 4 is the best damn FPS since Halo 3.
Proud pre-orderer of 2 PS4's and an Xbox One. 

Currently Playing: Dark Souls II, South Park
Playstation 4: MGS V GZ, Killzone: Shadow Fall, NBA 2k14.

Around the Network
archbrix said:
Max King of the Wild said:
archbrix said:
Max King of the Wild said:
archbrix said:

Can we now expect a thread from you on southern population too?

Are you going to argue that most people who live in the south dont live in texas?

Oh no, I wouldn't think of it.  Besides, I've already given you a win on the topic of generic soft drink names.  After all, it's the least I can do.  

You should also give me a point for proving Slowmo is paranoid when it comes to Ps3 fans too since I have provided evidence for that. And then admit I know what I'm talking about and most people in NA don't call gaming devices xbox.

Sorry, but I don't see paranoia in the evidence against Slowmo.

And regarding gaming terminology I don't have a map, but I know what the popular console brand is here in the US. When people not informed enough to refer to a specific game console mention games, they usually say "Xbox". It's not as common to hear "Playstation" in this context anymore. When they show a game system in a TV show, it's usually a 360 (or Wii for a while), but rarely is it a PS3. So unless you have another map proving otherwise, I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul.



Well thats just speculation on your end which you have the burden to prove. If anything it reverted back to Nintendo because of the Wii and its demographics.

"Looks at page 1, leaves thread... Nice OP ruined once again by a [sony fans] yet again...."

"How hyped are all the Sony fans on this site that all they can do is talk about the Nextbox? "

"Why is it the only people desperate for news is the Sony fans on the site."

I could keep going



Max King of the Wild said:
slowmo said:
Max King of the Wild said:
slowmo said:
CGI-Quality said:
slowmo said:
DanneSandin said:
2 things has to be admitted; PS3 did in fact an incredible come back after it's fiasco of a launch. It did quite poorly to begin with, but turning that ship around, and now being a VERY close third is very impressive. That's one thing

The other thing we have to admit is that PS3 cost Sony A LOT of money. It's profitable now, and it'll continue to make money for some years to come, but it'll never TRULY offset the money that it lost. It might have earned back every cent and dime it initially lost, but it will never be a big financial success. Never. It has lost too much money for that.

What we as gamers all can hope for, is that Sony learned a great deal of things by the PS3; let's hope PS4 kicks ass!


We keep getting told that it did so awful at the start yet launch aligned we are also told it outsold the 360 so it obviously was never that bad to begin with.  Its a lie spread by Sony fans to make the situation appear worse than it was.  

Here's the easiest way to look at it - the PS3 may have always been set-up to outsell the 360, but BECAUSE of the failings of its launch (really till about 2009), it held itself back from such a reality, sooner.

Make no mistake, it is this gen's biggest loser (regardless of passing the 360), but it isn't a lie that it had a bad launch. 


Thank you for at least posting a reasoned argument to try and debunk my point, shame Max didn't have your civility.  Lie was a strong word but I think its fair to say there are some fans who paint the launch as being far worse than it actually was.  The console was too expensive and lacked games, 2007 when the 40GB was released saw the start of it being fixed.  That's less than 12 months really.

The shame is you are paranoid and always blame Sony fans for something and used flawed logic to get your conclusions. Such as 2 consoles launch badly. One console beat the other console. Therefore it didnt launch badly.


Wow, it looks like paranoia is catching...

Except, we can look at your post history and see how often you bring up Sony fans and see that pranoia is not catching.

"The only thing I found out from this debacle is Sony fans have awful internet connections. Moderated, -Mr Khan..."

"Its a lie spread by Sony fans to make the situation appear worse than it was.  "

"At least all the Sony fans who have been relentlessly trolling the Next box this week should have no issues with a negative opinion piece thread about the PS4...."


Context is brilliant, you never fail to enforce the stereotype.

Please don't defend me guys, Max just doesn't like the truth.  I see he's now taken to editing my posts also to try and make some point.  Let him venture further off topic, hell get himself banned (again) soon enough.



slowmo said:
Max King of the Wild said:
slowmo said:
Max King of the Wild said:
slowmo said:
CGI-Quality said:
slowmo said:
DanneSandin said:
2 things has to be admitted; PS3 did in fact an incredible come back after it's fiasco of a launch. It did quite poorly to begin with, but turning that ship around, and now being a VERY close third is very impressive. That's one thing

The other thing we have to admit is that PS3 cost Sony A LOT of money. It's profitable now, and it'll continue to make money for some years to come, but it'll never TRULY offset the money that it lost. It might have earned back every cent and dime it initially lost, but it will never be a big financial success. Never. It has lost too much money for that.

What we as gamers all can hope for, is that Sony learned a great deal of things by the PS3; let's hope PS4 kicks ass!


We keep getting told that it did so awful at the start yet launch aligned we are also told it outsold the 360 so it obviously was never that bad to begin with.  Its a lie spread by Sony fans to make the situation appear worse than it was.  

Here's the easiest way to look at it - the PS3 may have always been set-up to outsell the 360, but BECAUSE of the failings of its launch (really till about 2009), it held itself back from such a reality, sooner.

Make no mistake, it is this gen's biggest loser (regardless of passing the 360), but it isn't a lie that it had a bad launch. 


Thank you for at least posting a reasoned argument to try and debunk my point, shame Max didn't have your civility.  Lie was a strong word but I think its fair to say there are some fans who paint the launch as being far worse than it actually was.  The console was too expensive and lacked games, 2007 when the 40GB was released saw the start of it being fixed.  That's less than 12 months really.

The shame is you are paranoid and always blame Sony fans for something and used flawed logic to get your conclusions. Such as 2 consoles launch badly. One console beat the other console. Therefore it didnt launch badly.


Wow, it looks like paranoia is catching...

Except, we can look at your post history and see how often you bring up Sony fans and see that pranoia is not catching.

"The only thing I found out from this debacle is Sony fans have awful internet connections. Moderated, -Mr Khan..."

"Its a lie spread by Sony fans to make the situation appear worse than it was.  "

"At least all the Sony fans who have been relentlessly trolling the Next box this week should have no issues with a negative opinion piece thread about the PS4...."


Context is brilliant, you never fail to enforce the stereotype.

Please don't defend me guys, Max just doesn't like the truth.  I see he's now taken to editing my posts also to try and make some point.  Let him venture further off topic, hell get himself banned (again) soon enough.



Lol my last ban was appealed first of all and the one before that I stand by. Secondly, I haven't edited your post. Third, half of your post that bring up sony fans have no context. They are literaly "sony fans at it again" and dont address topics



You added Sony fans to one of those quotes you used as "evidence", which you seemed to infer from the topic you took that from. Second the behaviour of Sony fans was particularly appalling earlier this year which is why 10+ got banned in one thread, thus making my posts on them more apparent recently. Would you like me to start quoting your post history of attacking Microsoft fans in your typically rude and ignorant manner. Please don't bother quoting me in future, I find you particularly odious to talk to.



slowmo said:
You added Sony fans to one of those quotes you used as "evidence", which you seemed to infer from the topic you took that from. Second the behaviour of Sony fans was particularly appalling earlier this year which is why 10+ got banned in one thread, thus making my posts on them more apparent recently. Would you like me to start quoting your post history of attacking Microsoft fans in your typically rude and ignorant manner. Please don't bother quoting me in future, I find you particularly odious to talk to.


Please quote me "attacking" ms fans for being MS fans. As for the one I "edited" no Sony fans got banned in.

Ignorant means not knowing. I don't do that. Rude? hell yes I do that to people who deserve it and it isnt against the rules.