By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Putting animals down: Opinions

It would be selfish to not put the pet down if it's suffering. Pet's can't speak, you have to speak for them. And you better make the right decision. (In this case, putting it down would be the best decision.)



Around the Network
BaldrSkies said:
Animals don't "think" or "want".

They follow a pre-programmed set of routines, some of which may be adaptable to changing environmental conditions.

They definitely don't want to die though.



pokoko said:
People usually make every important decision for their pet. They decide if they're going to ever breed, where they're going to live, what they're going to eat, and even where they're going to crap. Suddenly, though, when an animal is suffering, some start to worry about what the pet wants? Right. That's cowardice and a way to shirk an unpleasant responsibility. They've made that animal dependent on them. What I really hate is when people pretend that they're going above and beyond to keep the pet alive for the sake of the animal when it's usually just a selfish desire to keep the pet with them for as long as possible or to avoid the guilt of having it put down.

It sounds like you are only addressing a scenario where the decision is clear and yes, I agree pet owners tend to extend their suffering for the reasons you described, but what about the grey area? What about a scenario when an animal is suffering to some degree (and perhaps not indefinitely, there often is a hope of recovery) but you still aren't sure if it's a life worth to live or not?



I would put it down if its life could be saved but the procedure is expensive. I would put it down if it were completely healthy and i didntwant it anymore. No grey area



As a lover of animals, and more then likely I will have a future working with animals. If I had euthanize a dog or any animal due to an infection or something I knew they would ultimately die from, I'd have to say yes for the sake of putting it out of it's own misery. Something unnecessary I am completely against.



Around the Network
Slimebeast said:
pokoko said:
People usually make every important decision for their pet. They decide if they're going to ever breed, where they're going to live, what they're going to eat, and even where they're going to crap. Suddenly, though, when an animal is suffering, some start to worry about what the pet wants? Right. That's cowardice and a way to shirk an unpleasant responsibility. They've made that animal dependent on them. What I really hate is when people pretend that they're going above and beyond to keep the pet alive for the sake of the animal when it's usually just a selfish desire to keep the pet with them for as long as possible or to avoid the guilt of having it put down.

It sounds like you are only addressing a scenario where the decision is clear and yes, I agree pet owners tend to extend their suffering for the reasons you described, but what about the grey area? What about a scenario when an animal is suffering to some degree (and perhaps not indefinitely, there often is a hope of recovery) but you still aren't sure if it's a life worth to live or not?

Life is full of tough decisions. That's what being a responsible adult is about. You have to make an informed descision based on what your vet recommends. What's best for your pet is not always what's best for you or what makes you feel good.



We do sometimes "put" people down such as my grandfather who had multiple problems (alzheimer's, parkinson's, and probably a few other things). Well one day he lost the ability to swallow. My mom (daughter) could have decided along with her siblings to stick a feeder down his throat or hook an IV to keep him alive. However, they decided to let him die. When you lose the ability to swallow that might be a sign that it is your time. There are numerous other cases where family members "pull" the plug like those who suffer brain damage, coma, etc..  I believe keeping someone alive purely on machines with no chance of recover is unethical.  The ethical thing to do is let the person die.



I had put down my beloved cat. It is painful to see them suffering,as much as i wanted to hold onto her for longer, sometimes it is the right thing to do.



My family put down our oldest dog earlier this year. He was almost 16, was completely blind and deaf, and also had cancer (I believe it was prostate). We had him on antibiotics to help with his bladder for a few months but it got worse and worse. He hardly moved around anymore and when he did he'd be constantly walking into walls and had no sense of direction.

I remember the day we put him down quite well. There was just a strong sense of sadness in the house. We fed him a big juicy steak for his last meal before taking him to get put down. Such a sad experience.