theprof00 said:
walsufnir said:
theprof00 said:
walsufnir said:
theprof00 said: Who called this 2 days ago, and had his thread locked? Me, that's who. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=158444 Though, the early rumor said it would be 99$ and not support 360 games, I did say no disc drive. 149$ and plays games makes sense given the wii slim's function.
That said, I'm not upset that my thread was locked. Just gloating. |
Your thread was based on an article dated 2012/11/21, this is 2013/04/10 and this also says that the small 360 can play 360 games.
|
I called that the stingray was this exact set-top box, and I also predicted it would not have a hard-drive.
The only thing that was wrong was the no-playing games, but 99$ and no games is virtually the same as 149$ that plays games. Stay mad.
That's how analysis is done, son.
|
I am not your son, keep watching your tone. And perhaps read again "149$ or lower" - we don't know the price yet and it's of course easily changed by MS. Actually, all the rumors saying always on and no used games was stingray, after all. Doesn't affect NextBox. Good.
|
Hey, you can believe whatever you want. All I do is provide an analysis and a prediction. I predicted the stingray was the settop box known as xbox tv. The title of the thread was "Is this the MS SKU Stingray".
I got as much right as I did wrong, and that's better than anyone in the other stingray threads had done.
|
No this was mentioned in your quote, not your analysis.
This is what you quoted: "We're told that the set-top box is part of a two-SKU strategy for Microsoft's next-generation of Xbox hardware that will be unveiled in 2013" This has nothing to do with any prediction or analysis you made. It's the source itself saying it. Predicting the "name" is not really an acomplishment :)
But let's stop arguing and be happy that all this talking about NextBox was mostly wrong, good for gamers!