By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Real or not, Jesus is the most influencial Human in history! If you deny that you are lying to yourself-

 

Most influencial?

Obama 10 3.82%
 
Greg Johnson 2 0.76%
 
Elvis 6 2.29%
 
Karl Marx 12 4.58%
 
Benji Franklin 5 1.91%
 
Jesus 140 53.44%
 
Shakespear 6 2.29%
 
Mel Gibson 11 4.20%
 
Islam God, do not want to... 25 9.54%
 
Other ( Post below fake internet friends!) 43 16.41%
 
Total:260
Mazty on 08 April 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:

Seriously?? Do you have proof that Matthew, Mark, Luke or John wrote the Bible? Oh wait, it's known that they weren't around when Jesus was.

Please, we are talking about history here, so drop any notions you have of "the bible has to be right" and let's approach this from a logical standpoint, okay?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Mark


I don't think the Bible is right... but that doesn't mean you are right either. And I'm well aware of the 4 source theory.

I never said I was right, but I've given evidence. Claiming something is written by someone "cuz it says so" isn't an argument...Ultimately this whole thread is BS as it makes the false assumption that Jesus wrote the Bible, which is complete crap; it's just an exercise in outing mass ignorance. 



Around the Network
NintendoPie on 08 April 2013
spurgeonryan said:
kitler53 said:
what about adam? imagine if he had been content with all the animals of the world or addicted to masturbation. then where would we be?

Jesus Fixed Adams mistake of not being addicted to porn. He was in fact addicted to his Beastiality slut of a wife Eve, who thought Adam was a push over and all she wanted to do was have more and party. Jesus fixed that. Dont you see!

That's a great start for a TV Drama!



Max King of the Wild on 08 April 2013
Mazty said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:

Seriously?? Do you have proof that Matthew, Mark, Luke or John wrote the Bible? Oh wait, it's known that they weren't around when Jesus was.

Please, we are talking about history here, so drop any notions you have of "the bible has to be right" and let's approach this from a logical standpoint, okay?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Mark


I don't think the Bible is right... but that doesn't mean you are right either. And I'm well aware of the 4 source theory.

I never said I was right, but I've given evidence. Claiming something is written by someone "cuz it says so" isn't an argument...Ultimately this whole thread is BS as it makes the false assumption that Jesus wrote the Bible, which is complete crap; it's just an exercise in outing mass ignorance. 



The guys name could be dickless joe for all I care but the fact remains the author is known as "Moses." Your argument can be said about Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Hesod, Xenophanes, ect ect... great logic



NintendoPie on 08 April 2013
spurgeonryan said:


It would be on past your bed time though. Sorry.

:-P

That, or it would be too abstract for me to care about watching it.



Max King of the Wild on 08 April 2013

I dont even see any reference to Jesus writing the Bible either



Around the Network
snyps on 08 April 2013

Jesus was influential but not nearly as much as the committee that decided to turn everyone against his moral teachings. I talking of coarse about the committee that assembled the bible. What a book of shit that is. The parts in red are diamonds in a dung hill.



Mazty on 08 April 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:

Seriously?? Do you have proof that Matthew, Mark, Luke or John wrote the Bible? Oh wait, it's known that they weren't around when Jesus was.

Please, we are talking about history here, so drop any notions you have of "the bible has to be right" and let's approach this from a logical standpoint, okay?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Mark


I don't think the Bible is right... but that doesn't mean you are right either. And I'm well aware of the 4 source theory.

I never said I was right, but I've given evidence. Claiming something is written by someone "cuz it says so" isn't an argument...Ultimately this whole thread is BS as it makes the false assumption that Jesus wrote the Bible, which is complete crap; it's just an exercise in outing mass ignorance. 



The guys name could be dickless joe for all I care but the fact remains the author is known as "Moses." Your argument can be said about Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Hesod, Xenophanes, ect ect... great logic


No, the author is CLAIMED TO BE Moses, just as the Bible is CLAIMED to be the word of God. 

And no, there is a lot of evidence for people like Plato:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato

And as I have already shown, it is quite clear that the history of the Bible is convoluted at best. Please don't just make up crap like that what I have said is applicable to any one person from an arbitrary time ago.



Max King of the Wild on 08 April 2013
Mazty said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:

Seriously?? Do you have proof that Matthew, Mark, Luke or John wrote the Bible? Oh wait, it's known that they weren't around when Jesus was.

Please, we are talking about history here, so drop any notions you have of "the bible has to be right" and let's approach this from a logical standpoint, okay?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Mark


I don't think the Bible is right... but that doesn't mean you are right either. And I'm well aware of the 4 source theory.

I never said I was right, but I've given evidence. Claiming something is written by someone "cuz it says so" isn't an argument...Ultimately this whole thread is BS as it makes the false assumption that Jesus wrote the Bible, which is complete crap; it's just an exercise in outing mass ignorance. 



The guys name could be dickless joe for all I care but the fact remains the author is known as "Moses." Your argument can be said about Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Hesod, Xenophanes, ect ect... great logic


No, the author is CLAIMED TO BE Moses, just as the Bible is CLAIMED to be the word of God. 

And no, there is a lot of evidence for people like Plato:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato

And as I have already shown, it is quite clear that the history of the Bible is convoluted at best. Please don't just make up crap like that what I have said is applicable to any one person from an arbitrary time ago.

The Odyssey is claimed to be by Homer. Would you argue so passionatly against that?



Zkuq on 08 April 2013

I don't know about most influential but his existence has definitely the most visible consequences.



Mazty on 08 April 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Mazty said:

Seriously?? Do you have proof that Matthew, Mark, Luke or John wrote the Bible? Oh wait, it's known that they weren't around when Jesus was.

Please, we are talking about history here, so drop any notions you have of "the bible has to be right" and let's approach this from a logical standpoint, okay?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Mark


I don't think the Bible is right... but that doesn't mean you are right either. And I'm well aware of the 4 source theory.

I never said I was right, but I've given evidence. Claiming something is written by someone "cuz it says so" isn't an argument...Ultimately this whole thread is BS as it makes the false assumption that Jesus wrote the Bible, which is complete crap; it's just an exercise in outing mass ignorance. 



The guys name could be dickless joe for all I care but the fact remains the author is known as "Moses." Your argument can be said about Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Hesod, Xenophanes, ect ect... great logic


No, the author is CLAIMED TO BE Moses, just as the Bible is CLAIMED to be the word of God. 

And no, there is a lot of evidence for people like Plato:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato

And as I have already shown, it is quite clear that the history of the Bible is convoluted at best. Please don't just make up crap like that what I have said is applicable to any one person from an arbitrary time ago.

The Odyssey is claimed to be by Homer. Would you argue so passionatly against that?

The Bible, a work of multiple authors over centuries, and the Homeric Question are not the same thing. Please stop arguing something you don't understand:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeric_Question