By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate is a bad, lazy port.

Tagged games:

siavm on 03 April 2013

This is a better game than tri. Your problems are not problems to me.



Around the Network
burninmylight on 03 April 2013
Mr Khan said:
famousringo said:
I hear you Chrizum, although I don't agree with several of your points (only 1 and 3 are relevant to me). MH3U on Wii U is great in spite of itself. It's a sloppy port, poorly polished when compared to the 3DS version or Tri on Wii.

I'll add that its usage of the touchscreen is terrible. It doesn't even fill the whole screen, the map is hard to read, and it missed the opportunity to improve inventory management, which is a sore point in the Monster Hunter experience.

Agree on the second point. There really seems to be no reason for the touchscreen to be there, aside from a handier method of online typing for those who don't have USB keyboards.

The only change that really bugs me is the 30-character limit for texting online. The removal of subquests is a bonus in my eyes.

I miss the subquests. Extra rewards (although MH3U seems to be more generous with rewards in general) and the ability to end a quest early with any items you found.



LilChicken22 on 03 April 2013

WHEREISALATREON?!



Skeeuk on 03 April 2013


from the demo i played it looked a little rough



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Jumpin on 03 April 2013

The hit zones are majorly improved from Tri.

Also the game is much better balanced than Tri and has way better content.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network
NoirSon on 04 April 2013

Credit the quality of the game being ported but you can't say they specifically enhanced the Wii U version aside from some graphics, nor does it come close to showing what the system is capable of.



nero on 04 April 2013
famousringo said:
Conegamer said:
I get what you're saying, but there's a lot of happy people out there...

I just feel the touchscreen is poorly used more than anything.


How awesome would it be to simply have ten or so slots to fill with your most commonly-used items? Tap once to put away weapon, tap again and use the damn item without having to hunt through all your crap. Sometimes I feel the game should be called Inventory Hunter.


loool, that's true, it takes minutes to find what you want in the inventory. The more you have, the more time it takes. Too bad they didn't use the gamepad screen to its best, only the tv-off funcionality. That's more for newcomers, for veterans, we all are used to it xD