I recommend a dictionary to alot of you guys then go and check what revolution means. Then compare it to the term evolution. Thank you :)
I recommend a dictionary to alot of you guys then go and check what revolution means. Then compare it to the term evolution. Thank you :)
Revolutionize the gaming industry? What feature on PS4 makes you think that? Did I miss something?
Any system can have something about it that could be considered "revolutionary"; heck, the Gamecube made bluetooth wireless controllers popular, lol. But a bona fide system revolution such as the NES, GB, PS1, DS or Wii? No, not from the direction they've shown so far.
Truth is, very few systems achieve that status and certainly don't need to achieve that to be successful.
Dgc1808 said:
Probably because of the bolded. Your post does seem like you think it won't be a revolution because of a lack of never before seen features. |
No, i think it wont be revolutionary because of it has been done before and the internet is what held onlive back. Same goes to digital. We are not ready to go completely digital yet. Technology needs to advance before something like this is available to everybody. XBL/PSN isnt available to everybody in the world because some people cant get internet but enough people has it to have changed gaming forever. Galkai looks like it will use a lot of bandwidth although they could shock everybody and it wont, i dont know. But as of right now going off of what we know then no, most people wont have the internet capable to keep up with galkai. Not a bad thing because the people who can use it will most likely love it. Onlive isnt that old. Motion controls was never implemented right or made mandatory. XBL or an online component to consoles was tested by Sega and the dreamcast but two things held it back. Sega's lack of multiplayer games and the lack of making customers happy with the Dreamcast in general. Halo pretty much popularized online gaming for consoles. Then you have the CD drive. I think that is the only one that that took off on it's first try although I could be wrong. Someobody will correct me if I'm wrong.
As far as game sharing it has been done and Onlive is still going and has proven to be unsuccessful so far. This isn't something that has been tried years and years ago. They are still trying. Becuase Sony is a more popular brand name it has a better chance but they HAVE to make sure people can use it on their internet. If I was to answer this right now I would say that it is a great expansion on the online infastructure but probably wont take off until interrnet catches up years from now. Then again as I said before mayb sony and galkai was able to implement this correctly.
JayWood2010 said:
|
Gaming habits and demographics along with game genres will be revolutionized. I wouldn't be surprised if a new genre all together emerges from some creative minds
Max King of the Wild said:
|
I'd love to see that. We need something refreshing in the game industry.
NO. The PS1 (and the 3DO to a point), was revolutionary.
Yes, all of the things from pcs/mobiles/handhelds that make them so easy to use will finally be on consoles:
-suspend mode, resume console immediatly
-background downloads, installs etc
-multitasking
-better media playback options
-no more slowdowns, smooth user experience
How so?
Technology wise? No. Games will look prettier but its not gonna change how they are made.
Market wise? Maybe. Its too early to tell and depends in great part on what the competition does.