By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - What technological events/milestones do you expect to occur within your lifetime?

man-bear-pig said:

He undoubtably did decay...the bible is wrong. Also, resurrection is impossible.

He was in the tomb for not even 3 days and was tightly wrapped and treated with embalmment spices.

The bible is true and the resurrection is fact. Prove me wrong.



Around the Network
happydolphin said:
man-bear-pig said:

He undoubtably did decay...the bible is wrong. Also, resurrection is impossible.

He was in the tomb for not even 3 days and was tightly wrapped and treated with embalmment spices.

The bible is true and the resurrection is fact. Prove me wrong.


You are wrong. It's as simple as that.



man-bear-pig said:

You are wrong. It's as simple as that.

Prove it.



happydolphin said:
man-bear-pig said:

You are wrong. It's as simple as that.

Prove it.

Padibullah, you are wrong. I don't need to waste my time proving it.

Anyway, you're the one who's being ridiculous, so if anyone needs to prove anything it should be you. But you don't need to, because here is the only proof you have: "It was written in a book hundreds of years ago"

I can't have an intelligent conversation with someone who bases their entire belief system on that statement.



man-bear-pig said:

Padibullah, you are wrong. I don't need to waste my time proving it.

Anyway, you're the one who's being ridiculous, so if anyone needs to prove anything it should be you. But you don't need to, because here is the only proof you have: "It was written in a book hundreds of years ago"

I can't have an intelligent conversation with someone who bases their entire belief system on that statement.

You said this -> "He undoubtably did decay...the bible is wrong. Also, resurrection is impossible."

It's up to you to prove your claims. if you can't, then just say imho. Don't just come up to my belief and say  "that's wrong", because it's a very bad attitude to have. It leads you nowhere, and it certainly leads me nowhere. If you can't work with that, just keep it to yourself.



Around the Network
happydolphin said:
man-bear-pig said:

Padibullah, you are wrong. I don't need to waste my time proving it.

Anyway, you're the one who's being ridiculous, so if anyone needs to prove anything it should be you. But you don't need to, because here is the only proof you have: "It was written in a book hundreds of years ago"

I can't have an intelligent conversation with someone who bases their entire belief system on that statement.

You said this -> "He undoubtably did decay...the bible is wrong. Also, resurrection is impossible."

It's up to you to prove your claims. if you can't, then just say imho. Don't just come up to my belief and say  "that's wrong", because it's a very bad attitude to have. It leads you nowhere, and it certainly leads me nowhere. If you can't work with that, just keep it to yourself.


This is a scientific thread, so if you wanna talk about biblical crap then please take it somewhere else. Resurrection is scientifically possible and Jesus' body will be so badly decayed by now that there's only unrecognisable bone fragments left. End of. Thanks.



man-bear-pig said:

This is a scientific thread, so if you wanna talk about biblical crap then please take it somewhere else. Resurrection is scientifically possible and Jesus' body will be so decayed by now that there's probably only unrecognisable bone fragments left. End of. Thanks.

I read the slash as "Tech events" slash "Milestones".

Sorry for being unscientific. But for the record, religion has its place in science, in the fields of Theology, History and many more. Also, I believe that Christ made you and all the Techs this world has, and in my mind, that will be the biggest breakthrough you'll have ever seen.

But hey, that's just me. Enjoy your exclusive No-God club.



Medicine will be greatly improved, things like AIDS and Cancer will be a "thing of the past", before a new disease pops up.

The World will be overpopulated and gas/oil/food will run low.

Petrol/Diesel engines will be a "thing of the past", with 95% of the developed nations running mainly on electricity.

There will be a homosexual Pope.

Humanity will begin to populate the moon.

Human cloning.

Huge developments in solar technology.

There will be people who are more machine than human. Bio-Implants will be the "in thing". No more need for steroids, instant muscle growth.

There will be a global currency, no physical money or cards, but done through nanotech

Nanotech.

I think some of that could happen.



                            

1. Nuclear fusion economically viable
Hopefully just in time to replace the dependence on fossil fuels before it becomes too much of a problem

2. Hydrogen fuel cell technology widely used
To replace all fossil fuel needs in moving vehicles

2b. Miraculous breakthrough in battery technology
Maybe something coming from carbon nanotube technology, alternative to the problems of building a hydrogen fuell cell based economy.

3. Quantum computing
This will speed up a lot of research in science, especially in genetics and curing diseases.

4. Mind computer interface
You hear that inner voice in your head, what if you could instruct/reason with a computer just by thinking of talking/reasoning with it.



man-bear-pig said:
GameAnalyser said:
1. Man on Mars
2. Human DNA coding 100 % complete
3. E=/=mc^2(Einstein debunked era)
4. PS10(augmented reality gaming)



@bolded, what do you mean by that?

Classified.