^really but what if the answer to a question is shorter then 4 words?
tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"
oh, i understand......it
phew, that was close
Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.
The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.
| brute said: ^really but what if the answer to a question is shorter then 4 words? |
expand upon your answer
Example/
Will the new forum rule help limit random spam and trolling?
Yes, of course, with the limit of words at 4 words people cant troll by saying PS3 sux, or Wiistards are fags, or just plain posting spam, or old in topics. For old topics It will force them to put a link (counts as a word in posts) and say "has been posted already." Plus it will make it so posts are a touch more intelligent sounds.
As you could see I could have answered a simpe Yes, but i explained upon the answer improving it's overall quality.
ssj12 said:
expand upon your answer Example/ Will the new forum rule help limit random spam and trolling? Yes, of course, with the limit of words at 4 words people cant troll by saying PS3 sux, or Wiistards are fags, or just plain posting spam, or old in topics. For old topics It will force them to put a link (counts as a word in posts) and say "has been posted already." Plus it will make it so posts are a touch more intelligent sounds.
As you could see I could have answered a simpe Yes, but i explained upon the answer improving it's overall quality. |
but what if the quality of the rest of someones post is just as bad as wii sucks?
he will probably get banned anyway
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
kirby007 said:
but what if the quality of the rest of someones post is just as bad as wii sucks? he will probably get banned anyway |
we sadly cant do anything about that.. the point of this is to improve the general quality of this site and show we have mature members. There is always at least one bad seed.
ok well now i see,its good keep up the work on making it better
tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"
ssj12, if you are going to enforce this (in my opinion crazy, and not specified in the rules) rule, then you must also ban gebx at the top of the page for posting
"Congrats to Both!!"
as that only contains 3 words, and 2 exclamation points.
Also, please ban Bodhesatva for also just posting a picture (it only contained 2 words)
In all reality, I think that you need to learn to moderate with a bit of mercy instead of banning people for doing nothing to actually disturb the forums. For example, send weezy a warning telling him he is breaking a rule that unless he was stalking DKII he would never know about.
Also, please get ioi to update the rules, if you are going to be enforcing it so strictly, so people can see it coming rather than being blindsided.
^yes i think you make a good point mods need to read it
tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
