By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - North Korea makes one of the dumbest decisions in history- Decides to Nuke America

S.T.A.G.E. on 09 March 2013
chapset said:
America would not nuke them back that would be bad politic but they would get invade in no time


America would make Iwo Jima seem tame if they got bombed by North Korea. We've got bases all over the world at an arms length of North Korea. North Korea wouldnt want to get occupied after a brutal bombing and the Army, Navy, Airforce and our allies come in.



Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. on 09 March 2013
PDF said:
melbye said:
The only thing they would get out of that is their own death and a world war


They would get their death but no World War.   No one is going to support NK, especially if they fire first.

Iran has been looking for a reason to attack the US. North Korea could be just the catalyst they need.



S.T.A.G.E. on 09 March 2013
Fusioncode said:
Does North Korea realize what they're doing. After the embarrassment that was Iraq, the US is dying for a win. Like World War 2 where the whole country will rise up in support and america will be the heroes again.


America gets more powerful after wars and sometimes not in a good way. We're too good at it and that becomes a huge problem because its in the culture now.



SlayerRondo on 09 March 2013
the2real4mafol said:
Very misleading title, North Korea hasn't nuked anyone yet but the possibility is looking so likely unfortunately. I hope that continue to piss off China, then the Kim regime can finally go.

If it happened i would rather have China annex it than have Korean reunification. Reunification would put much strain on South Korea's economy at least right now, but China could deal with it.


Would the best solution not be annexing but rather a joint task force to remove the current regime and help the North Koreans install their own government while providing economic assistance from the global community?

With with short to medium term military restriction's to be sure.



This is the Game of Thrones

Where you either win

or you DIE

sc94597 on 09 March 2013

The U.S government only has itself to blame, to be honest. Our interventionist ways since the end of World War II (with no intentions to change) made (and still makes) the U.S a target. If these people truly want freedom and liberty, they need to earn it, as our continental predecessors had done. Of course, that's not the true intentions of the U.S government anyway. The real intentions were and still are imperialism and power, in that - these "enemies" of ours have made the correct assessment.



Around the Network
ironmanDX on 09 March 2013

I hope they do it. The city in the US gets evacuated before it hit and ten the US send the same Seal team in to kill him. This world would be much better without him.


Also what SethNintendo said applies.



Assyrian612 on 09 March 2013
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
NintendoPie said:
Goodness, THE USA are like little children that think they can do whatever they want and not get punished for it.

Stop trying to kill us North Korea! This wouldn't be good for either side.


FIXED   :)   

(just look at what the US of A did during the last 15 years and what bad stuff north korea did in comparison. Can you name 1 really bad thing they did other than going "BLAH BLAH BEWARE OF MIGHTY N.KOREA BLAH!" ? I doubt that)


America may have some problems but we aren't threatening to Nuke someone either.  If N. Korea is so childish to do something like that not ONly will America respond but much of the world will respond.  Nukes are not something to play around with.


Yup  instead the USA invades countries     thats certainly much better :)

N.Korea will never nuke the USA  they are not dumb  people that believe this propaganda shit   should think about it... 

The USA would also not nuke other countries  because now (in comparison to WW2) other countries also have nukes and will take revenge. 

Noone will ever nuke some other country  because that would basically be the end of the world.


Invading a country is much better than nuclear warfare and you know that.  If you don't like America than so be it but don't be childish about the subject either.  Like i said, America has done some thing that has been wrong but in this case we are not wrong.  This is a situation that in my opinion needs to be dealt with and if force is necessary then so be it. I dont agree with needless war but this is a case that effects the entire world so if we attack N. Korea and kill innocent people we are still protecting many more innocent people at the same time.  

Now you can talk all the shit about U.S.A you want but this time i see it hard to to point a finger at us while we are not the ones threatening to nuke someone.  What country are you from?  And if we threatened to nuke you guys how do you think your country would react?  Do you think other countries would react as well?  And damnit this news effects you as well so think before you talk.


I am sorry but your clearly fell for the propaganda shit    dude :)    Invading a country that NEVER DECLARED WAR is not good at all. If you think otherwhise I am really sorry for you.  You also did what they want you to do   You take US-government critic and assume its "I hate america".   Why would I dont like America?
I play American games, I watch American movies, I listen to American music.  I speak English because of AMERICA (as If I would learn English because of Great Britain LOL  :)

The real country/government/whatever  that needs to be dealt with is the lobbyist  assholes all around the world.  That want to earn money.

There is no force needed at all since N.Koreas can say whatever they want within their own territory.   Do you feel the need to force everyone to be like you are?

If you invade countries and in doing so kill innocent people how is this good? Can you guarantee that the other country will attack you ? No you cant.   Remember the Iraq shit?    WE ARE 100% SURE THEY HAVE NUKES, CHEMICAL WEAPONS BLAH.  Guess what nothing!  Don't fall for this shit twice!  Germans felt for the same crap 70 years ago and it feels like Americans are their spiritual successors...

Sure you are not the ones threatening to nuke someone you already threatened the whole world to invade every country that doesnt play by your rules. You do this so great your own population doesnt even think its threatening anymore.   You sabotage other countries economy (sanctions etc.)  Thats certainly better than what N.Koread did (which was just USING WORDS to show the world that they are not IRAQ)

Seriously  think about it.  
You are N.Korea  you deal with your own shit  then there is the USA a huge powerful country that obviously can do whatever it wants because it is part of every major world council.  UN security council/economics/human rights whatever. There is not even 1 thing in the world that has influence without the USA being a part of it or being in full control.

The only way to prevend your country from being f*cked (no matter how shitty it is)  is to come up with  effective ways to defend.  In this case  the easiest way  are nukes which act as a deterrent.


Now there is the USA  they dont want you to have an effective way to defend so they come and tell you to stop having nukes etc.  HOW DUMB IS THIS?
The USA is basically  EA and in this case N.Korea is Nintendo lol.  Ask others to willingly have a disadvantage(Origin/no defence) and if they say NO  act all angry  and punish (no support/sanctions)  WTF?!?


I mean the USA is working on a ANTI NUKE SHIIELD   to have an advantage. People dont want the USA to have this   the USA doesnt care what others want. The usa will have the advantage soon enough....

Conclusion:

  1. The USA wants the be the most powerful country
  2. The USA doesnt want non-kissass-countries to have a way to defend themselves against the USA
  3. The USA mentally and economically attacks those countries with sanctions, threats and anti-non-kissass-country-propaganda
  4. The USA starts to invade those countries as long as the USA knows their defence is weak
  5. The USA places marionette governments there to turn the country into a kissass-country
  6. If 4. is not working then the USA comes up with plan B (in case of N.Korea  NUKE-DEFENCE so the N.Korean nukes will have no effect)
  7. If non kissass-countries don't want the USA to have NUKE-DEFENCE  the USA ignores this because it doesnt have to fear sanctions etc (the USA would not put sanctions on itself)


    Seems fair! 

    P.S. The reason why I have a different view than you is that I am not part of the crap thats going on to the same extent you are a part of it. My view is partially flawed by the somewhat biased media coverage but its not as bad as it could be. And because its just partially biased its easier for me to see the whole picture not just 1 part of it.


Lengthy comment so at least you put thought into it.  I don't agree with you but i appreciate that you put time into it.

I still believe N.Korea is wrong. If they want Nukes for defense that is one thing but they are planning to attack from many statements that has been said in the last few months.  America isn't going to do something until we are pushed and this is pushing the issue.  As far as Iraq, I live in the US and very few people agree with us being in Iraq so we aren't mindless people here like you are making us sound.  And once again Iraq shouldnt have attacked us and we would never have had an excuse to go there in the first place.  i still dont agree with us being there still but that was Iraq's decision to attack america.  

Iraq never attacked America. Obviously you are mindless and need to catch up with the truth rather than what you hear. Al Qaeda attacked the U.S., not Iraq or any of the innocent people that were murdered and still are being murdered bcuz of your genius president bush and his crooks. It is people like you who piss me off here, who act all patriotic, but know nothing except what they believe in the news. Accusing an innocent country then murdering its people and its minorities, then you still have the balls to say Iraq attacked us. LOL Why don't you do a google search. Thanks.



 

mai on 09 March 2013
SlayerRondo said:

Would the best solution not be annexing but rather a joint task force to remove the current regime and help the North Koreans install their own government while providing economic assistance from the global community?

Hello my dear fellow kulturtrager, let's show these negros I mean Koreans how we, white sahibs, roll :D

sc94597 said:

The U.S government only has itself to blame, to be honest. Our interventionist ways since the end of World War II (with no intentions to change) made (and still makes) the U.S a target. If these people truly want freedom and liberty, they need to earn it, as our continental predecessors had done. Of course, that's not the true intentions of the U.S government anyway. The real intentions were and still are imperialism and power, in that - these "enemies" of ours have made the correct assessment.

Have you ever read Simak's Good Night, Mr. James? Puudly = the US.



Aj_habfan on 09 March 2013

It seems like the only really people in danger here are the South Koreans. And it seems like South Koreans believe US propaganda and overblown media reports are the main issue, and they don't feel at risk from North Korea. So why are so many Americans bothered?

If even SK doesn't seem too worried by all of NK's recent activity, not sure why anyone should. Put those UN sanctions into action and watch the show.



PScollector on 09 March 2013

Dont think it would end 2 well for old north korea, and if somthing was 2 happen id think China would step in and end them.



 

Check out my Youtube channel : http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePSXcollector