By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - North Korea makes one of the dumbest decisions in history- Decides to Nuke America

Sick and tired of all these countries that takes the USA military for granted. Once US drones start attacking 24/7 and US bombs and attack helicopters piloted by men with very little consideration for life start fucking up everything that moves in N.Korea, everybody will be crying for peace.
The last thing any nation should be doing is calling out the US military in its current powerfull and most potent state. That's like picking a fight with an exploding star. Just don't do it.

Not a big fan of war nor am I saying this with American pride, but it is just fair to see that the US military is the most powerfull military ever in the histor of civilization, they are too powerfull in fact. So why would you want them declearing war on you? 

Just don't expect an Avatar ending when the shit starts N.Korea.



Around the Network
BenVTrigger said:

To answer your question it would really only take 1 nuke on their capital city to effectively end N. Korea

That being said I dont condone or support the use of nuclear weapons and hope there will be other, safer ways to resolve the N Korean crisis.

Well, 2000 MOABs should total 20kton without nasty radiations.   

Kim family members are such happy-go-lucky, they'd do it for the lulz and so would do Obama too! 



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


Marks said:
phinch1 said:
Marks said:
If you nuke N. Korea wouldn't the radiation spread to S. Korea, China, Japan, etc.? So that's not really an option. But obviously we could destroy them without nukes also.


I doubt that, look what happend to you guys in Vietnam


1. US Deaths 58,000 - Vietnamese deaths minimum 500,000... maximum 1,000,000

2. Democracy thriving - Communism dead

All in all things went okay. And that was just an invasion to stop communism. Imagine an actual full on war in retaliation for a nuclear threat? We would devestate them. 


im sorry but just imagine if they posted sales on here like that, they'd be laughed at, just like im doing now "all in all things went ok"  seriously?



phinch1 said:
Marks said:
phinch1 said:
Marks said:
If you nuke N. Korea wouldn't the radiation spread to S. Korea, China, Japan, etc.? So that's not really an option. But obviously we could destroy them without nukes also.


I doubt that, look what happend to you guys in Vietnam


1. US Deaths 58,000 - Vietnamese deaths minimum 500,000... maximum 1,000,000

2. Democracy thriving - Communism dead

All in all things went okay. And that was just an invasion to stop communism. Imagine an actual full on war in retaliation for a nuclear threat? We would devestate them. 


im sorry but just imagine if they posted sales on here like that, they'd be laughed at, just like im doing now "all in all things went ok"  seriously?


Well sorry I just did a quick wiki search and didn't care enough to find a scholarly report for you. I'm assuming 1 million is the US/NATO estimate and 500k is the Vietnam gov't estimate. They always conflict with each other. 

A lot harder to measure deaths in a war (especially in a "3rd world country") than video game sales across the developed world. 



SlayerRondo said:
the2real4mafol said:
Very misleading title, North Korea hasn't nuked anyone yet but the possibility is looking so likely unfortunately. I hope that continue to piss off China, then the Kim regime can finally go.

If it happened i would rather have China annex it than have Korean reunification. Reunification would put much strain on South Korea's economy at least right now, but China could deal with it.


Would the best solution not be annexing but rather a joint task force to remove the current regime and help the North Koreans install their own government while providing economic assistance from the global community?

With with short to medium term military restriction's to be sure.

If the Kim dynasty went, why would there be a need for 2 koreas? If China annexed it, it could develop the North and eventually give it to the South to form one Korea, when the economic burden of reunification would be far less. The economic disparity between North Korea and South Korea is huge, it makes the disparity between East Germany and West Germany in the 1980's seem normal. I'm just not that convinced the UN and the international community could do this, if the USA played a major role it can't afford to help North Korea grow, like it could when it helped Japan and South Korea, in the 1950's and 1960's. The USA can't even afford war anymore, it needs to realise this. 



Xbox One, PS4 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch will sell better than Wii U Lifetime Sales by Jan 1st 2018