Plus another reason for my "hunch" is the fact that MS has never in the past had there final dev kits ready so far in advance. I remember listening to the OXM podcast and they were talking about how there very first preview game for the 360 was still being played on a custom pc with a 360 controller plugged into it cause the final dev kits hadn't been sent out yet.
Like I said I could be wrong lol

While some things will stay the same about Durango, there have been likely some chances, Microsoft has never had a static roadmap in 12 months before product release, let alone 22 months.

That was from before MS rebid the console in 2011.

Source: S|A who was the first to say, a year ago,hat both consoles would be AMD CPU+GPU

Well those spec seem real, and i believe MS will also house 8gb GDDR5 of RAM..

Anyway the differences of the 2 consoles will be minor....now where that leaves WiiU?

Same CPU used in PS4.

The big difference to PS4 will be the memory and eSRAM.

And the fixed-function-units in Durango :)

There is more except the Data Moves engines? These exists to free up the CPU and GPU from the data moved into the memory... more like a alternative to together with eSRAM to avoid the DDR3 low bandwidth bottleneck.

---

Thread fixed. 

~tads12

Good job Ethomaz breaking the thread :P

We have yet to see what really is in Durango. Also according to vgleaks: "The Durango GPU includes a number of fixed-function accelerators. Move engines are one of them." The other ones are (by now) for image decompression and I doubt that if there will be fixed-function units that this is the only thing they'll do. Either way, they exist *and* are clearly a difference in the architecture.