No man that's not why i think it's unnecessary. I mean this is an invitation for some to begin making up all kinds of 'theory' as to how this 'shows' that one system is better or worse than the other. That's all.

Maybe it's me, but i think this increases the chances for some to troll or gives them oppertunities to do so. But i'm rambling now, so go ahead :)

If i see any argueing Ill take one down.  If people are still argueing over multiplatform there just being childish.  If you ask me, 99% of multiplatofm games are nearly identical between the two consoles lol

worse review scores then DMC 2013? wow this game is a real hack and slash game not like whatever NT made

We all knew the media was infatuated with DmC. :  )

I would have predicted DmC would score higher than this, just based on the media impressions....but I actually kind of want to play Metal Gear Rising.

The size of the controller, and the positioning of its thumbstick(s) make up for those two-point difference

Gearbox takes over game with troubled development cycle- Half asses it and puts out a shit product.
Platinum games takes over game with troubled development cycle- Puts effort in and makes something pretty good.

It's really good so far, though don't expect a MGS story. The story and writing is pretty weak.

It seems that the game is much more of a Platinum game than a MGS game.  That means if you're in it, you should be in it for the action.  The story may or may not make any sense.

Can Konami learn with their mistakes now?

94 - http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/metal-gear-solid-4-guns-of-the-patriots

Anyway.... I'm more interesting in sales of this game.

The the difference between the times isn't that great... so a 5 hours Game Result is somehting near 7 hours playtime (os less)... ops the image show the Hard difficult.