How can you cure something that isn't ill?
That depends of if you consider them ill or not.
I wouldn't consider it an illness of any kind, to me it just what they're attracted to. Like if a guy was into older women, or how someone can be attracted to someone of a different race. It's not wrong it's just a opinion on what they're sexulity attracted to. So there's nothing wrong with it at all.
Well, my opinion on homosexuality differs from yours. I don't think homosexuality is a matter of preference (like likeing Black guys, or older women), I think it's much deeper. If it was a matter of preference, then I think two things. 1. There is no homosexual, only a bisexual because preference is, as stated, a preference, not a limitation. 2. People's preferences change (you can be into older women for a while, have a bad relationship, and then be into women you age, etc), so homosexuals should easily be able to become heterosexuals if they chose too. However this isn't the case.
Genetic modification is not as easy as you think. We don't have a cure yet, much like we don't have a cure for Down Syndrome, but you are right, we can change our genes to become anything. We could alter ourselves to have two vagina's/dicks if we wanted to, or just become hairless.
I don't think everyone should be "cured", but I think the option should exist for homo's who wish to live a hetero lifestyle.
I agree with you on that. But if the option is available then someone somewhere is bound to abuse it.
I agree with you, lol. You are a logical thinker.
Now this brings the question, which is worse? A community without a cure for homosexuality, which oppresses ALL of the homosexuals who wish to live heterosexual lifestlyes, or a community with a cure, which oppresses SOME homosexuals into "cure" themselves?
I know in Canada, we would never resort to the second option, but I bet in the Middle East, this would be an immediate law.