tagging for late. looks like an interesting video.

I have seen the opening scene before. It was reported on in Australia that video which leaked out.

Tagged

@Zero you are maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad late

I opened my eyes back in 2008 by accident.

my transition was scary because i was alone and i couldn't talk to anybody without them saying that i was crazy or something

i cant watch the video right now but i will get around to it later

my advice is to look at everything with an open mind. also "conspiracy theorist" is basically the low-key equivalent of calling somebody crazy

just to let you know

;)

Eye-opening, jesus :D If you learn history through Discovery channel, that's surely could be eye-opening. Though maybe I missed smth, wasted like 20 min scrolling through the video.

What is exactly your conclusion after what you saw you consider eye-opening? Just curious.

Perfectly valid attack, they were armed. The latter part (not shown) of the video (where the van came in to evacuate wounded) could be considered as "too much" though. I understand why people so emotionally react on the video, but there's really nothing special in it.

Look closely, some of those people were armed. Yes, there was collateral damage including children and the cameraman. Isn't that smth you'd expect?

Ok, I've watched it all. It's better than I thought it would after first impresion. For a journalistic job it is fine. At least they've started with one substantial thing when talking about Iraq:

Funny quote (tragic voice): "Nothing... of what he claimed was true...", -- O'rly? Wasn't it obvious before? Though I could believe that Powell wasn't lying and as he claims was deceived. But I surely cannot beleive that CIA was deceived. UNSCOM's Ritter is there as well. What? Changed his opinion already? At the time he was saying quite different things.

Some BBC lady answering the question "Why the media didn't get it?": "...because lack of access...", -- what a load of bollocks and desperate attempt at covering your lying arse. Has smth changed about BBC? Well, judge for yourself... like Lybia or Syria and counting. He challenged her again with uncomfortable question on covering Palestinians point of view practically saying: "Where the f**k is your objectivity?" -- oh boy, how lame did she sound trying to asnwer it.

Hollywood did take some beating too, like it :D ...and then cry and sniffle kicks in. Some Israeli war crimes, some Assange, that's common.

//Still all of these are old news and Pulcinella's secret overall, might be interesting for those who's absolutely blind or didn't give a shit about farce happening at the time... justice, lol.

Hopefully, the internet will put an end to this kind of media manipulation in the long run.

Internet is as much of manipulated environment as MSM are, it's not a saving grace. Works in a way viral marketing works in the business, people get paid for posting. Though most of the time it's just a plain disinterest of the audience that makes things worse.

The difference is that the internet is a free marketplace of ideas. And in that environemnt, good ideas, and correct facts tend to beat out the bad and wrong ones.