If you read my post you'd see I did answer your question.  I simply didn't agree with your ridiculous assessments you pinned to either answer.  Do you just not understand that supply can exceed demand?  You seem to think if there is any demand for a product then it is automatically supply constrained.  You do this despite copious evidence to the contrary.  If you believe so strongly that the Wii U is supply constrained in Europe, why don't you buy up these ones that are available (for reduced prices even!) and sell them?  Surely if demand is exceeding supply you could make a tidy profit.

Also your numbers are all over the place.

50%
10%
1-2 million
minimum 4.6% (1.5 million)  How the minimum is above the minimum in your previous range, I don't know.
5-10 million worldwide

I mean if you're going to claim something is supply constrained purely based on a sell-through number without any other evidence, then the least you could do is pin it down.  So tell me, at what point between 1 million and 16.2 million will the Wii U magically stop being supply constrained?  You did suggest that saying only 50% of Wii owners wanting a Wii U was bashing it, and based on your question earlier if somebody wants something they either buy it immediately or it is supply constrained.  Therefore I guess we'll have to listen to these supply constraint claims till at least 2015.  Actually considering after 4 weeks it is only at 59% of Wii sales maybe we are looking at 2017.

Let's break down one of your claims.  You say Nintendo will easily sell 1-2 million Wii U's by the end of March, and that is what they projected.  First of all Nintendo didn't project a range as far as I'm aware, and certainly not one so large.  One million and two million are very far apart when we are talking about a launch.  Since you are continuing with this supply constraint claim, Nintendo would have known months ago exactly how much it would sell in Europe since regional distribution of supply doesn't change at the drop of a hat.

So with that piece out of the way, lets look at the actual numbers.  1-2 million.  The Wii shipped 1.47 million to Other by March 31, 2007, and sold 1.41 million in Europe per VGC in the same time period.  Now we know after 4 weeks in Europe the Wii U is only at 59% of Wii sales.  That would suggest 833k by the end of March.  Now if we are incredibly generous we can say the Wii U will end the year at 500k.  That would mean in order to hit the top end of your prediction (2 million), the Wii U would need to more than double the Wii performance from the same quarter in 2007.  Does this in anyway seem realistic to you?  That would require average weekly sales of 115k.  A number the Wii U has only exceeded on launch day.  Even to hit the low end of 1 million would require average weekly sales of 40k.  If we use last weeks sales as a point of reference.  If the PS3 saw a similar dip for Jan-Mar it would sell 2.4 million in Europe for the quarter.  Even the Wii only averaged 55k a week during that period in 2007, and that was a system that sold 155k in the week prior to Christmas.  More than double what the Wii U did.

Looking beyond all these figures, just tell me one thing.  If the Wii U is supply constrained in Europe, why can I go on Amazon France/Germany/Italy/Spain and order one right now for a reduced price?  Why aren't the people who supposedly want a Wii U doing that?

Don't forget, though, that this week last year included all the last seven days before Xmas, while this year it includes five of them and the last two are in the successive week.