Soleron said: I like this idea? A comprehensive negative result commissioned by people desperate for a positive would be great to use if this comes up again. |
You can't be serious.
There is ****-tons of research already. This is POLITICAL. This has ****-all to do with 'science'.
Good God, he's politicizing the shootings in CT *and* using videogames as a scapegoat and the best you can say is "hey, great, another study that, even if it says what gamers wnat it to, will be ignored...again" just like Lieberman and Clinton (hmm, what do Lieberman (at the time), Clinton, Leland Yee (Cali State Senator) and Rockefeller all share in common..hmmm) ignored all the research from the 90s in the early 00s, and Yee ignored in the late 00s.