By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Top 5 of the worst beautiful games

bananaking21 said:
DarkD said:

PS3 has tonnes of games which got released early, bombed and were considered huge disappointments. Not to mention bankrupting the companies that built them.

Ill start with Lair great graphics, but terrible game. Got sacked by the reviewers as a buggy and shallow mess of a game.

Another one, Fable 3...... Amazing graphics, people can't get over the graphics in Fable 3 most of the time, but GOD AWFUL GAMEPLAY.... SO BORING... You spend the entire game shaking hands with people or farting in their faces or dancing around doing the chicken dance in front of people..... The fights are considered some of the worst in gaming history as the magic is stupidly overpowered, same with the shotgun, then the swordplay is considered underpowered by comparison.

Duke Nukem Forever. Need I say more?

Bomberman Act Zero ... look it up... its a disgrace on the entire series of bomberman.

duke nukem looked like shit

it didn't look that bad on PC... but still, I don't know anyone ever describe that as beautiful. I think he got sidetracked, with more than just that too.



Around the Network

Kirby's epic yarn.



ishiki said:
bananaking21 said:
DarkD said:

PS3 has tonnes of games which got released early, bombed and were considered huge disappointments. Not to mention bankrupting the companies that built them.

Ill start with Lair great graphics, but terrible game. Got sacked by the reviewers as a buggy and shallow mess of a game.

Another one, Fable 3...... Amazing graphics, people can't get over the graphics in Fable 3 most of the time, but GOD AWFUL GAMEPLAY.... SO BORING... You spend the entire game shaking hands with people or farting in their faces or dancing around doing the chicken dance in front of people..... The fights are considered some of the worst in gaming history as the magic is stupidly overpowered, same with the shotgun, then the swordplay is considered underpowered by comparison.

Duke Nukem Forever. Need I say more?

Bomberman Act Zero ... look it up... its a disgrace on the entire series of bomberman.

duke nukem looked like shit

it didn't look that bad on PC... but still, I don't know anyone ever describe that as beautiful. I think he got sidetracked, with more than just that too.

lol he defaintly got sidetracked lol



Skyrim

Some beautiful environments and really good graphics for a game of it's nature but it's combat is clunky and boring and there isn't a whole lot going on in the story and characters department either.



Halo 3 ODST.



Around the Network
KylieDog said:
Dunno why people list Resident Evil 6, that game is steps backwards from RE5 graphically. More night or dull daylight sections though to hide it.


Anyway...


...Metal Gear Solid 4. Graphically was great on release...but oh god everything else.


I agree on both counts.

I thought I was the only one who found RE6 graphically inferior to 5.



Paquito said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Wii_R2_Hardcore said:

And Nintendo games don't count because when we say graphics we are not talking about specs, we refer to design.

 


That makes no sense, but I'm pretty sure I know what you intended to say :P

...

I think Skyrim matches perfectly - The game as a whole is beyond awesome, but the actual gameplay is stale as fuck.


I explain to you.

Nintendo can make the most beautifull goty on a resolution of 720px x 576px with the power of NES.


I don't think you understand. This thread is supposed to be about games with great graphics and bad gameplay, which is why Nintendo doesn't count. He said though that Nintendo doesn't count because "we are not talking about specs, we refer to design", which would suggest that Nintendo does count.

It's a clear contradiction on his part.



An argument could be made for virtually every highly rated game with high end graphics: the game play and story will not appeal to all game players.
For me: Final Fantasy XIII, Prince of Persia (2008), Assassins Creed and Resident Evil 5 all had excellent graphics but the game play in all of those games were shallow and lackluster.
The top games that managed to bring top graphics and game play together as a complete package this generation were Uncharted 2/3, Gears of War series, Skyrim, Bioshock, GTA IV and Portal 2.



So, on one hand we have a classic gathering of PS3 haters 

and on the other the totally butthurt people who didn't understand what the hell went on in MGS4 and FF XIII.

Moderated,

-Mr Khan



DarkD said:

PS3 has tonnes of games which got released early, bombed and were considered huge disappointments. Not to mention bankrupting the companies that built them.

Ill start with Lair great graphics, but terrible game. Got sacked by the reviewers as a buggy and shallow mess of a game.

Another one, Fable 3...... Amazing graphics, people can't get over the graphics in Fable 3 most of the time, but GOD AWFUL GAMEPLAY.... SO BORING... You spend the entire game shaking hands with people or farting in their faces or dancing around doing the chicken dance in front of people..... The fights are considered some of the worst in gaming history as the magic is stupidly overpowered, same with the shotgun, then the swordplay is considered underpowered by comparison.

Duke Nukem Forever. Need I say more?

Bomberman Act Zero ... look it up... its a disgrace on the entire series of bomberman.

Totally agree with Fable 3 the gameplay is awful but Fable 2 isn't a lot better and both games have terrible load times and you spend a large amount of time at looking at the load screen instead of playing the game.  Fable/Fable the Lost Chapters is still the best game in the franchise and it could have been a lot better also.