By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why does it seem like the vita is getting more games than the 3ds?

loopy93 on 08 December 2012

Because I bought 3DS



Around the Network
Ganoncrotch on 08 December 2012
bananaking21 said:
ganoncrotch said:
bananaking21 said

 3 angry birds games which cost 40 bucks where you could get them all on your andriod for free with more levels. 


They can?! that is cool to know you've done market research and found that every 3ds owner also has an android device with them at all times too. You also need to put up with adverts all over the droid version of Angry birds unless you pay for it as well as just the convience factor of having the trilogy in a tiny cart for the 3ds along with other good portable games rather than having to carry around 2 devices to save 40euros.

wow what a ridiculous post. why are people still hung up on this thread any way


why is it ridiculous in any way? you claim that no one should buy angry birds when they can get it on their Android device. It's like saying no one with a ps3 should have bought Bioshock when it came out a year later because they could get it cheaper on the xbox (providing they also buy an xbox) The Argument fails in every way.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Michael-5 on 08 December 2012
grytechog said:
Its going to be only another 6 months 3DS then Vita will crush its games in Quality and Innovation.

With what 3 games? Killzone, Tearaway and Soul Sacrifice?

3DS is getting more exclusives in 2 months then Vita is in the next 6.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Michael-5 on 08 December 2012
Nem said:
Michael-5 said:
Nem said:

Its a ridiculous assumption. Half of the Vita games dont even leave Japan aswell.

From next years list see the difference:

For Vita:
Dragon's Crown
Final Fantasy X HD
Killzone Mercenary (I'm especially excited for this one)
Soul Sacrifice
Dead or Alive 5 Plus
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 Plus
Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time
Tearaway

For 3DS:
Ace Attorney 5
Animal Crossing
Devil Summoner: Soul Hacker
Donkey Kong Country: Returns (rumored)
Dragon Quest VII
Fire Emblem (new footage from Nintendo Direct looks awesome)
Luigi's Mansion
Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate
Monster Hunter 4
Pokemon Mystery Dungeon
Prof Layton vs. Ace Attorney
Shin Megami Tensai IV
Castlevania: Lords of Shadow - Mirror of Fate
Brain Age

Vita: 2 Ports of PS3 games, im assuming thats a new Sly cooper as i dont follow the series, but it would be 3 exclusive Vita games.

3DS: 5 exclusive games and a port. Also these exclusives are the size of Castlevania, Luigi's mansion and Animal crossing and the port is no less than Monster Hunter 3G. The last 3 will probably outsell all exclusives Vita will have for the year. This is also not counting Bravely default wich has been trademarked already for the west.

The 3DS is a smashing sucess in Japan, its garanteed to have plenty more titles announced to it next year. I think this is just another case of denial. Dont get me wrong, i want a reason to buy a Vita. If it had full backwards compatibility i would already be planning to get one, but those argument are too weak and everyone can see through the desperation.

Your list is incomplete, just look at the Most Wanted section if you want ot check for all the games. I bolded what I added.

So 3 exclusive Vita games, a port, and 3 enhanced remakes.

and 12 exclusive 3DS games, a port, and an enchanced remake.

This kinda favors 3DS....just a bit.

Thank you, though its missing Tear up and PSO2 on the Vita side.

Still it makes it completely obvious that the 3DS line-up is miles ahead of the Vita one. Vita fans, this is not the way to raise good will towards your favorite system. Lieing pushes people away, doesnt draw them in. Vita is a nice system and has interesting games coming for it, but it just cant compare to what the 3DS got.

I missed that you didn't have Tearaway on your PSV list, but what's PSO2? If it's Phantasy Star Online 2......yea that doesn't count, those games sell like crap, and usually get bad scores.

As for Vita....yea I recently bought a PSP instead lol. PSP has so many amazing JRPG's, except for a couple ports, PSV really has none. 3DS already has or has comming soon, a lot of the games that made the DS so great. Games like Super Mario, Fire Emblem, Mario Kart, Dragon Quest VII, and a few other new JRPG's. PSV really hasn't succeeded the PSP yet in terms of games, I have yet to see one new Square Enix PSV exclusive to make me want to put down my PSP SE exclusives.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

bananaking21 on 08 December 2012
ganoncrotch said:
bananaking21 said:
ganoncrotch said:
bananaking21 said

 3 angry birds games which cost 40 bucks where you could get them all on your andriod for free with more levels. 


They can?! that is cool to know you've done market research and found that every 3ds owner also has an android device with them at all times too. You also need to put up with adverts all over the droid version of Angry birds unless you pay for it as well as just the convience factor of having the trilogy in a tiny cart for the 3ds along with other good portable games rather than having to carry around 2 devices to save 40euros.

wow what a ridiculous post. why are people still hung up on this thread any way


why is it ridiculous in any way? you claim that no one should buy angry birds when they can get it on their Android device. It's like saying no one with a ps3 should have bought Bioshock when it came out a year later because they could get it cheaper on the xbox (providing they also buy an xbox) The Argument fails in every way.

well on andriod the 3 anrgy birds games are free and are 3 dollars combined on iOS and are 40 bucks on 3DS.  thats roughly 13.3 times more expensive than the iOS versions. to use your example of bioshock now, your saying would would i get two devices ? well bioshock released for 60 bucks if the ps3 version released for 13.3 times more expensive for that it would cost 798 dollars. now whats the logical thing to do? just not play the damn game. and thats why nobody on the 3ds should play angry birds whether they have  a smartphone to play it on or not. and its certainly no game to go brag about and be happy that its getting. the fact that people are actually counting this game on the 3ds when talking about what games the 3ds is getting is just sad, its just that simple



Around the Network
Michael-5 on 08 December 2012
bananaking21 said:

wow what a ridiculous post. why are people still hung up on this thread any way

Because PSV fans who clearly prefer PSV games over 3DS think that the PSV has more exclusive offerings then 3DS.

If you like PSV or 3DS better, it's really just your opinion. There is nothing wrong with liking Ragnarok Odyssey over Fire Emblem, but that doesn't mean that there are more PSV exclusives then there are 3DS. Just more games to the taste of the threat starter dude.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Ganoncrotch on 08 December 2012
bananaking21 said:
ganoncrotch said:
bananaking21 said:
ganoncrotch said:
bananaking21 said

 3 angry birds games which cost 40 bucks where you could get them all on your andriod for free with more levels. 


They can?! that is cool to know you've done market research and found that every 3ds owner also has an android device with them at all times too. You also need to put up with adverts all over the droid version of Angry birds unless you pay for it as well as just the convience factor of having the trilogy in a tiny cart for the 3ds along with other good portable games rather than having to carry around 2 devices to save 40euros.

wow what a ridiculous post. why are people still hung up on this thread any way


why is it ridiculous in any way? you claim that no one should buy angry birds when they can get it on their Android device. It's like saying no one with a ps3 should have bought Bioshock when it came out a year later because they could get it cheaper on the xbox (providing they also buy an xbox) The Argument fails in every way.

well on andriod the 3 anrgy birds games are free and are 3 dollars combined on iOS and are 40 bucks on 3DS.  thats roughly 13.3 times more expensive than the iOS versions. to use your example of bioshock now, your saying would would i get two devices ? well bioshock released for 60 bucks if the ps3 version released for 13.3 times more expensive for that it would cost 798 dollars. now whats the logical thing to do? just not play the damn game. and thats why nobody on the 3ds should play angry birds whether they have  a smartphone to play it on or not. and its certainly no game to go brag about and be happy that its getting. the fact that people are actually counting this game on the 3ds when talking about what games the 3ds is getting is just sad, its just that simple


you should put that on a sandwich board so and march up and down outside game shops over christmas and let people know! I'm sure it'll stop people getting the 140euros 3ds and buy an ipad for their kids for christmas to save 40euros.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

bananaking21 on 08 December 2012
ganoncrotch said:
well on andriod the 3 anrgy birds games are free and are 3 dollars combined on iOS and are 40 bucks on 3DS.  thats roughly 13.3 times more expensive than the iOS versions. to use your example of bioshock now, your saying would would i get two devices ? well bioshock released for 60 bucks if the ps3 version released for 13.3 times more expensive for that it would cost 798 dollars. now whats the logical thing to do? just not play the damn game. and thats why nobody on the 3ds should play angry birds whether they have  a smartphone to play it on or not. and its certainly no game to go brag about and be happy that its getting. the fact that people are actually counting this game on the 3ds when talking about what games the 3ds is getting is just sad, its just that simple


you should put that on a sandwich board so and march up and down outside game shops over christmas and let people know! I'm sure it'll stop people getting the 140euros 3ds and buy an ipad for their kids for christmas to save 40euros.

another ridiculous post, thank you for your contribution



Ganoncrotch on 08 December 2012
bananaking21 said:
ganoncrotch said:
well on andriod the 3 anrgy birds games are free and are 3 dollars combined on iOS and are 40 bucks on 3DS.  thats roughly 13.3 times more expensive than the iOS versions. to use your example of bioshock now, your saying would would i get two devices ? well bioshock released for 60 bucks if the ps3 version released for 13.3 times more expensive for that it would cost 798 dollars. now whats the logical thing to do? just not play the damn game. and thats why nobody on the 3ds should play angry birds whether they have  a smartphone to play it on or not. and its certainly no game to go brag about and be happy that its getting. the fact that people are actually counting this game on the 3ds when talking about what games the 3ds is getting is just sad, its just that simple


you should put that on a sandwich board so and march up and down outside game shops over christmas and let people know! I'm sure it'll stop people getting the 140euros 3ds and buy an ipad for their kids for christmas to save 40euros.

another ridiculous post, thank you for your contribution


you're very welcome for it, don't get yourself too worked up about Angry Birds 3DS anyways it only sold 50000 units on here that puts it well down around the 150th place of sales on the 3ds. you do still have around 149 more reasons above that to dismiss as non important games. If it had been a psvita release tho it woulda made the top 40 at least, would be worth arguing over then maybe :>



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

JimmyDanger on 08 December 2012
Turkish said:

My first console was the sega mega drive but whatevs. Out of all the consoles I own the Vita has the best launch line up Ive seen, outside PS2. It is amazing. So many different and unique games.

You didn't't understand me, I'm not arguing about scores or sales, you are. I don't care about 3DS games, there are maybe 5 3DS games I want right now while I already have 20 Vita games in 8 months.

Hatsune Miku PDf and DJMa Technika Tune are one of the coolest launches this year. Thank god for region free gaming.


Rightio. So I quantify "best launch lineup ever" with scores (usually the judgment of how good a title/titles are) - and you respond with basically - It's purely my personal opinion.

FIne. In your personal opinion - Vita has the best launch lineup ever. Better than PSX, SNES, Dreamcast (which were just the ones that sprung to mind off the top of my head). It's just a shame most rational minded, objective people would judge "best launch lineup ever" on tangible things like scores, and when hearing a statement like "best launch lineup ever" - would actually look at some other systems launch lineups to evaluate that judgement, rather than just take your word for it.

Hell - the Megadrive had Super Hang-On, Revenge of/Super Shinobi, Ghouls and Ghosts, Phantasy Star II and Golden Axe (off the top of my head) in its launch window just to name a few. Amazing stuff for 1989/90.

I disagree with your opinion of Vita having the best launch lineup ever - so there it is