By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - What can be done with Isreal? Realistically!

MrBubbles said:
Mummelmann said:
MrBubbles; so the holocaust excuses everything Israel does to someone else? That's an old and weak argument.


no one made that argument but you can continue to delude youself if you wish to be an ignoramus.


I hardly consider myself the ignorant party in this discussion. Insults aside; it was your intention to raise sympathy and have people look away from Israeli terror actions by posting that image, that much was clear. Its justification. Two wrongs does make a right etc.



Around the Network
MrBubbles said:
Rath said:
MrBubbles said:
 


if not for israel taking those lands there wouldnt even be a chance at a state of palestine.  it would still be jordan and egypt.    its a small minority in israel that think the entire land should be israel.  its a small minority in the territories that dont want the entire land to be palestine.   abbas plays lip service to the idea sometimes and then says things that clearly demonstrate he doesnt it.    the right of return wont happen and the jews will never give back the western wall in east jerusalem, so those demands cannot be on the table of they want any deal with israel.   abbas made recent comments backing off the right of return but they still demand east jerusalem.   how can things even get off the ground with an impossible demand?

I think if Israel was properly willing to negotiate (which Netanyahu is very much not) with Fatah then I believe the situation could be resolved. Simply however Israel will have to compromise on Jerusalem - the East of Jerusalem is Palestinian and what Israel is trying to do is annex it. This should be condemned.

In any negotiation Israel will have to compromise as well as Palestine, they need to meet in the middle. Your comments seem to indicate that you think Palestine should accept all of Israels demands, this is not reasonable.

east jerusalem is not palestinian.  what an odd comment from you.   how can you even imagine the jews would give up control of their holiest site and give it to someone who they cant even trust?   at best you could make an argument for a UN controlled city, but its not like the UN has been able to protect israel from its enemies so far.

there has never even been a state of palestine, mind you. 

Jerusalem for a large portion of its history has not been Jewish, but majority Muslim. Several of the holiest Muslim sites also exist in Jerusalem.

I think having either state have complete control over the Temple Mount and the adjacent holy sites (Al-Aqsa, Dome of the Rock, Wailing Wall) is a recipe for disaster actually and some sort of communual control over them is required.

 

However East Jerusalem as a city is largely Muslim in populace and is internationally recognised as not being part of Israel.

Perhaps an international city is a solution to the Jerusalem question, but in my opinion it is either that or the city being divided into two. There simply isn't going to be a long term peace that involves Israel having Jerusalem as its undivided capital.



Kasz216 said:

Except.... it isn't.  People find excuses all the time to allow or disallow these things.  The "difference" you are talking about is just another excuse that holds no real meaning.   They would pull their support the moment it became apparent it might pass.


Israel does not have any internationally recognised sovereignity over Palestine. As such the formation of Palestine is not seperatism.

The thing that concerns countries like Russia and Spain is whether self-determination can override sovereignity  - if said sovereignity does not exist (as is the case with Israel/Palestine) then it does not cause concern for those countries.



Everyone should watch this video from the young turks, if you want to see the whole situation in Palestine/ Israel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgl0JnE4B_4&feature=g-user-u#



Xbox One, PS4 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch will sell better than Wii U Lifetime Sales by Jan 1st 2018

Kasz216 said:

Also... as for what should be done? Nothing.

Nothing should be done... because there isn't shit that could be done.

Even if by some miracle you convinced Israel and Fatah to agree.... and lets say you got a perfect 100% equal deal on both sides. Both sides citizens would find the deal completely unacceptable.

Neither side is willing to accept a split Jerusalem. Which, when you consider Palestine's negotiating position is really quite insane.

I mean... look at the reaction of the Palestine Papers. Fatah's negotiators had to resign for even broaching the offer... and they didn't even admit they offered it, saying it was made up! Assuming Israel did agree... what's the likelihood of it actually going through?

Palestine can't even admit the offers they made.

Replying to something else you said actually

The current upgrade that Palestine is seeking can't be vetoed by America (up/down General Assembly vote only), yet i imagine the bulk of third worlders are going to go for it.

That upgrade would grant Palestine the same status as the Vatican City, entitling them access to the International Criminal Court.

There's a reason Israel is scared over this.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network

Out of all the posts so far I'd have to say I agree with Mr Kahn.

As to what can be done about Israel? If the US stopped supporting them financially and allowed Israel to fight their own fights I think with time things might settle down, but until that time Israel will continue to do what ever they want to the Palestinians knowing that no one can properly retaliate because the US will jump to their aid and bomb who ever does, but this will never happen because most of the richest and most powerful people in the United States are Jewish so they have a say in what goes on. Plus the US needs all the bankers to play ball with them.



I was walking down along the street and I heard this voice saying, "Good evening, Mr. Dowd." Well, I turned around and here was this big six-foot rabbit leaning up against a lamp-post. Well, I thought nothing of that because when you've lived in a town as long as I've lived in this one, you get used to the fact that everybody knows your name.

The UN should order Bar Refaeli to crash at my place. Then the Middle East will be one step closer to being judenfrei, and tensions will lower as Islamic sphincters across the region relax just a teeny tiny bit.

Baby steps...



badgenome said:
The UN should order Bar Refaeli to crash at my place. Then the Middle East will be one step closer to being judenfrei, and tensions will lower as Islamic sphincters across the region relax just a teeny tiny bit.

Baby steps...

I *still* remember her SI Swimsuit issue debut.

Damn...



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Rath said:
Kasz216 said:
 

Except.... it isn't.  People find excuses all the time to allow or disallow these things.  The "difference" you are talking about is just another excuse that holds no real meaning.   They would pull their support the moment it became apparent it might pass.


Israel does not have any internationally recognised sovereignity over Palestine. As such the formation of Palestine is not seperatism.

The thing that concerns countries like Russia and Spain is whether self-determination can override sovereignity  - if said sovereignity does not exist (as is the case with Israel/Palestine) then it does not cause concern for those countries.

Again International soverinty is irrelvent, considering the majority of these cases happened before such a term existed.

Look up the Nagorno-Karabakh situation for basically the exact same thing but without all the high profile involvement.



Kasz216 said:
Rath said:
MrBubbles said:
 


if not for israel taking those lands there wouldnt even be a chance at a state of palestine.  it would still be jordan and egypt.    its a small minority in israel that think the entire land should be israel.  its a small minority in the territories that dont want the entire land to be palestine.   abbas plays lip service to the idea sometimes and then says things that clearly demonstrate he doesnt it.    the right of return wont happen and the jews will never give back the western wall in east jerusalem, so those demands cannot be on the table of they want any deal with israel.   abbas made recent comments backing off the right of return but they still demand east jerusalem.   how can things even get off the ground with an impossible demand?

I think if Israel was properly willing to negotiate (which Netanyahu is very much not) with Fatah then I believe the situation could be resolved. Simply however Israel will have to compromise on Jerusalem - the East of Jerusalem is Palestinian and what Israel is trying to do is annex it. This should be condemned.


Most Palestinians in East Jerusalem want to be part of Israel though.  Shouldn't that be factored in?

Why ignore the wishes of the people actually living in the contested city?

I'd meet them halfway and make the entire city an International City, similar to Danzig before World War II (i'll grant that didn't end well, but it would be the best way to satisfy not only them, but adherents of all of the faiths who find it an important city).



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.