12676 posts since 28/04/07
Galaki on 12 November 2012
It's common knowledge that Super Mario Bros. is vastly more popular than Super Smash Bros.
So, why did Sony decided to make their own version of Smash but not Mario?
It seems easier to make a platformer, too, since you don't need to juggle with characters balancing.
p.s. Sony even got their own version of Mario Kart.
5932 posts since 05/02/12
bananaking21 on 12 November 2012
its because Sony has a superior 2D platforming game, its called littlebigplanet
Edit : for people who thought this was my own personal opinion
metacritic scores
littlebigplanet 95 > 89 super mario bros DS
Littlebigplanet 2 91 > 87 super mario bros Wii
Littlebigplanet vita 88 > 78 super mario bros 2 3DS
2523 posts since 15/04/12
the_dengle on 12 November 2012
Have you played Battle Royale? Clearly, character balancing was not one of Sony's concerns.
3836 posts since 28/02/09
PlaystaionGamer on 12 November 2012
bananaking21 said: its because Sony has a superior 2D platforming game, its called littlebigplanet |
this
Proud Prince of the Playstation Nation


Currently Online
4,417
1312 posts since 25/07/12
Player2 on 12 November 2012
Because Smash isn't an E-rated game like 2D Mario. No PS3 owner would buy such a kiddie game. Oh wait...
5932 posts since 05/02/12
bananaking21 on 12 November 2012
Ouroboros24 said:
PlaystaionGamer said:
bananaking21 said: its because Sony has a superior 2D platforming game, its called littlebigplanet |
this
|
Littlebigplanet has platformers and now karts. When will this game ever sell?
|
so all of a sudden littlebigplanet doesnt sell?
1643 posts since 27/03/09
Rafux on 12 November 2012
Sony has Littlebigplanet and they even had a superior clone of Mario Kart called Crash Team Racing.
babuks on 12 November 2012
I would like to see a platformer with less floaty jumps and more similar to Mario. Mario and LBP are enjoyable in two different ways.